Search

DIGITAL LIBRARY: CAMX 2019 | ANAHEIM, CA | SEPTEMBER 23-26

Get This Paper

Sensitivity Analysis of Induction Welding Process Variables

Description

Title: Sensitivity Analysis of Induction Welding Process Variables

Authors: Kerrick Dando, PhD, Mark Wadsworth, Matt Bickhard, Michel van Tooren, PhD, and Jaspreet Pandher

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/c.19.0842

Abstract: Carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites have experienced increasing application in the aerospace industry due to their superior toughness properties and high-rate formability. Thermoplastic composites also have the ability to be reprocessed providing a potentially cost-effective method of assembly. Most notably, the use of thermoplastic welding technologies could potentially eliminate the need for most fasteners and substantially reduce the cost of manufacturing aerostructures. Fusing composite parts without introducing foreign materials into the bond line is a potential advantage of induction welding and is being investigated by Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.

This work details an experimental investigation of continuous induction welding of thermoplastic composites comprised of unidirectional tape. The focus of this investigation was to understand the effects of key weld parameters such as clamping pressure, work head speed, and applied coil current on weld quality. Mechanical characterization in the form of single lap shear tests was used to evaluate the results. Induction welding equipment at University of South Carolina’s McNAIR Aerospace Center was used for fabrication of test coupons. It was found that while significant variation in weld strength was measured across sample sets, clear trends in the process variables’ effects on weld quality were observed. Both coil speed and applied coil current show the greatest impacts on weld strength; strength increases with increasing current at high work head speeds.

References: 1. Costa, A. P. D., Botelho, E. C., Costa, M. L., Narita, N. E., & Tarpani, J. R. (2012). A review of welding technologies for thermoplastic composites in aerospace applications. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 4(3), 255-265. 2. Zhao, T., Rans, C., Villegas, I. F., & Benedictus, R. (2019). On sequential ultrasonic spot welding as an alternative to mechanical fastening in thermoplastic composite assemblies: A study on single-column multi-row single-lap shear joints. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 120, 1-11. 3. Zhao, T., Palardy, G., Villegas, I. F., Rans, C., Martinez, M., & Benedictus, R. (2017). Mechanical behaviour of thermoplastic composites spot-welded and mechanically fastened joints: A preliminary comparison. Composites Part B: Engineering, 112, 224-234. 4. Villegas, I. F., Moser, L., Yousefpour, A., Mitschang, P., & Bersee, H. E. (2013). Process and performance evaluation of ultrasonic, induction and resistance welding of advanced thermoplastic composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 26(8), 1007-1024. 5. Rudolf, R., Mitschang, P., & Neitzel, M. (2000). Induction heating of continuous carbon-fibre-reinforced thermoplastics. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31(11), 1191-1202. 6. Jackowski, J. K., Goldstein, R. C., & Nemkov, V. S. (2014). Induction process and coil design for welding of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics. SAMPE Tech. 7. Duhovic, M., Caldichoury, I., L’Eplattenier, P., Mitschang, P., & Maier, M. (2014, June). Advanced 3D finite element simulation of thermoplastic carbon fiber composite induction welding. In ECCM 16–European conference on composite materials. 8. Becker, S., & Mitschang, P. (2017). Influence of textile parameters on the induction heating behavior of CFRPC. In 21st International Conference on Composite Materials, Xi’an, China. 9. Kagan, V. A., & Nichols, R. J. (2005). Benefits of induction welding of reinforced thermoplastics in high performance applications. Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, 24(13), 1345-1352. 10. Moser, L., Mitschang, P., & Schlarb, A. K. (2008). Induction welding of thermoplastic polymer composites using robotic techniques. SAMPE journal, 44(5), 43-48. 11. Stokes, V. K. (2003). Experiments on the induction welding of thermoplastics. Polymer Engineering & Science, 43(9), 1523-1541. 12. Velthuis, R. (2003). Induction Welding Technology-Joining Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Polymer (composites) for Aerospace Applications. In 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law (pp. I-3). 13. Yousefpour, A., Hojjati, M., & Immarigeon, J. P. (2004). Fusion bonding/welding of thermoplastic composites. Journal of Thermoplastic composite materials, 17(4), 303-341. 14. Lionetto, F., Pappadà, S., Buccoliero, G., & Maffezzoli, A. (2017). Finite element modeling of continuous induction welding of thermoplastic matrix composites. Materials & Design, 120, 212-221. 15. Bayerl, T., Duhovic, M., Mitschang, P., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2014). The heating of polymer composites by electromagnetic induction–A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 57, 27-40. 16. Velisaris, C. N., & Seferis, J. C. (1986). Crystallization kinetics of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) matrices. Polymer Engineering & Science, 26(22), 1574-1581. 17. Precision Induction Heating Equipment, Operation and Maintenance Instructions (AMBRELL, Scottsville, New York, USA). 18. ASTM Standard D1002-10 (2019). Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2015.

Conference: CAMX 2019

Publication Date: 2019/09/23

SKU: TP19-0842

Pages: 11

Price: $22.00

Get This Paper