Title: Mechanical Performance of Buckypaper Inserted Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composite Laminates

Authors: Vishwas S. Jadhav , Abhijeet Mali, Ajit D. Kelkar

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/c.22.0112

Abstract: Carbon-based micro or nanofillers reinforced carbon fiber are becoming popular for various applications due to their exceptional properties and low mass density. A small fraction of the fillers enhances the mechanical and electrical properties of the composite material by a few orders of magnitude. The main issue is the uniform distribution of these fillers into the material. When these materials are added to the matrix, they become more viscous and agglomerate due to the high aspect ratio and van der Walls attraction forces. Agglomeration causes the collection of bundles of these nanomaterials together, distributing them unevenly in the matrix. To avoid these, researchers used mechanical or chemical functionalization. Mechanical functionalization is time-consuming and breaks the fillers, while chemical functionalization techniques are lengthy and specialized for specialized material systems. These researchers used two-dimensional nanomaterials like PAN/PVP-based electrospun nanofiber mat, graphene-based papers, or carbon nanotube-based buckypaper to enhance the composite material properties. The present work manufactured the composite laminates using non-crimp carbon fabric MTM-45-1 prepreg in conjunction with 60gsm buckypaper from Nanotech lab at the mid-plane. The researchers analyzed their effect on mechanical properties such as interlaminar strength (GIC), flexural strength and modulus, short beam shear strength, and indentation hardness. Weak binding between Graphene and matrix resulted in degraded fracture toughness. The present research work used a lattice structure with vertical and horizontal grids to enhance the matrix-buckypaper binding, and the effects of lattice structure were evaluated. Electrical conductivity analyses were done using a Four-point probe to check the feasibility of using buckypaper to send electrical signals for applications such as health monitoring and electric shield for the composite material. The study suggested that the composite laminates fabricated using lattice bucky paper structure showed improvement in interlaminar strength compared to those manufactured without lattice buckypaper structure.

References: [1] S. Iijima, “Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon,” Nature, vol. 354, no. 6348, pp. 56–58, 1991. [2] M. R. Mansor, S. H. S. M. Fadzullah, N. A. B. Masripan, G. Omar, and M. Z. Akop, Comparison Between Functionalized Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes: Effect of Morphology and Surface Group on Mechanical, Electrical, and Thermal Properties of Nanocomposites. Elsevier Inc., 2018. [3] A. Khan et al., Functionalized Graphene Aerogel: Structural and Morphological Properties and Applications. Elsevier Inc., 2018. [4] X. Y. Chen et al., Functionalized Graphene-Reinforced Foams Based on Polymer Matrices: Processing and Applications, no. m. Elsevier Inc., 2018. [5] P. A. Lagace, R. L. Mong, and C. W. Kuhlmann, “Suppression of Delamination in a Gradient Stress Field in Graphite / Epoxy Laminates,” pp. 705–713. [6] Y. Xu, W. Hong, H. Bai, C. Li, and G. Shi, “Strong and ductile poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide composite films with a layered structure,” Carbon N. Y., vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 3538–3543, 2009. [7] M. A. Rafiee et al., “Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites,” Small, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 179–183, 2010. [8] A. D. Kelkar, R. Mohan, R. Bolick, and S. Shendokar, “Effect of nanoparticles and nanofibers on Mode I fracture toughness of fiber glass reinforced polymeric matrix composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng. B, vol. 168, no. 1–3, pp. 85–89, 2010. [9] N. Bagotia, V. Choudhary, and D. K. Sharma, “A review on the mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding properties of carbon nanotubes and graphene reinforced polycarbonate nanocomposites,” Polym. Adv. Technol., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1547–1567, 2018. [10] K. Mishra, K. P. Bastola, R. P. Singh, and R. Vaidyanathan, “Effect of graphene oxide on the interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon fiber/epoxy composites,” Polym. Eng. Sci., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1199–1208, 2019. [11] K. Mishra, L. K. Babu, and R. Vaidyanathan, “Influence of POSS-PVP in Modification of CFRP Interlaminar Fracture Toughness,” J Appl Mech Eng, vol. 8, pp. 1–6, 2019. [12] E. J. Garcia, B. L. Wardle, and A. John Hart, “Joining prepreg composite interfaces with aligned carbon nanotubes,” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1065–1070, 2008. [13] S. U. Khan and J.-K. Kim, “Improved interlaminar shear properties of multiscale carbon fiber composites with bucky paper interleaves made from carbon nanofibers,” Carbon N. Y., vol. 50, no. 14, pp. 5265–5277, Nov. 2012. [14] V. Jadhav and A. Kelkar, “Performance Evaluation of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Laminated Composite Embedded with Graphene Lattice Sheets,” CAMX – Compos. Adv. Mater. Expo. CAMX Conf. Proceedings. Dallas, TX, Oct. 19-21, 2021. CAMX – Compos. Adv. Mater. Expo, pp. 1–12, 2021. [15] W. S. Precision, “Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials,” Annu. B. ASTM Stand., vol. 00, no. Reapproved 2006, pp. 1–8, 2011. [16] ASTM D5528-01, “Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites,” Am. Stand. Test. Methods, vol. 03, no. Reapproved 2007, pp. 1–12, 2014. [17] ASTM International, “Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. D790,” Annu. B. ASTM Stand., pp. 1–12, 2002.

Conference: CAMX 2022

Publication Date: 2022/10/17

SKU: TP22-0000000112

Pages: 13

Price: $26.00