Title: Case Study of Core-Stiffened Wing Versus Skin-Stringer Approach for Intermediate-Size Flight Structures
Authors: Jeffrey M. Perkins, Richard K. Dropek
DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/c.22.0170
Abstract: Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) companies aim to produce a new style of aircraft, with new materials at a pace and scale that has not yet been accomplished in the composites aerospace industry. Many material options and manufacturing processes exist for prospective manufacturers who are looking to optimize the performance and minimize the weight of composite structures. Vehicle weight, manufacturing efficiency, and FAA certification are a few of the top considerations for AAM designers. This paper presents the results of an engineering study conducted to compare two different approaches for representative AAM vehicle primary structures. Equivalent core-stiffened and skin-stringer wing designs were developed for a typical mid-size (~12-meter) aircraft structure. The composite design, along with the tooling and equipment required for manufacturing, were evaluated for the wing skin and spar. Equivalency comparisons were made for buckling, overall strength, structural deflections, and weight using typical loading scenarios. The composite study showed that the skin-stringer designs may have equivalent or improved performance when compared to the core-stiffened wing designs. The stringer and intercostal designs act as a gateway allowing for the closed mold Same Qualified Resin Transfer Molding (SQRTM) prepreg manufacturing approach to provide FAA certifiable structures with improved quality and repeatability. This may also accelerate FAA certification while simultaneously enabling a transition to out-of-autoclave (OOA) processing.
References: 1. SMG Consulting, https://aamrealityindex.com/ , June 5th, 2022. 2. Christopher B. Courtin, Ara Mahseredjian, Annick J. Dewald, Mark Drela,R. John Hansman, A Performance Comparison of eSTOL and eVTOL Aircraft. Report No. ICAT-2021-02, August 2021 3. D. Guening and F. Mathieu, Evolution in Composite Injection Moulding Processes for Wing Control Surfaces. SAMPE Journal, January / February 2016 Vol. 52, No. 1 4. Bruno Castanie, Christophe Bouvet, Malo Ginot, Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications, Composites Part C: Open Access 1 (2020) 5. Martin Meindlhumer, Konstantin Horejsi, Martin Schagerl, Manufacturing and Costs of Current Sandwich and Future Monolithic Designs of Spoilers. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 56, No. 1, January–February 2019 6. Hannah Mason, Combination of automation, rigid foam core enable high-volume aircraft part production. Composites World, April 28, 2020. 7. Evonik Industries AG, Evonik Rohacell HERO Foam Core Used in Manufacture of Aircraft Nose Landing Gear Doors. https://www.axom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=11463, October 16, 2014.
Conference: CAMX 2022
Publication Date: 2022/10/17
SKU: TP22-0000000170
Pages: 18
Price: $36.00
Get This Paper 
  
  
   