Get This Paper

Investigating Marine Environmental Degradation of Additive Manufacturing Materials for Renewable Energy Applications


Title: Investigating Marine Environmental Degradation of Additive Manufacturing Materials for Renewable Energy Applications

Authors: Paul Murdy, Joshua O’Dell, David Barnes, James R. McVey, Christopher Rumple

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/c.23.0066

Abstract: Marine renewable energy is a relatively young industry where there is a great need for rapid prototyping in design-build-test campaigns to quickly mature groundbreaking technologies. Additive manufacturing has an important role to play in the industry; however, little information is available to marine energy developers to help inform them on which additive manufacturing materials are appropriate for highly loaded structures in harsh marine environments. This paper presents an initial study on the mechanical characterization of polymeric additive manufacturing materials and the degradation effects due to the marine environment. Ultem 9085, acrylonitrile styrene acrylate, and chopped carbon-filled nylon, as well as continuous carbon and glass fiber-reinforced nylon were chosen for this study. Samples were manufactured to perform a variety of tension, shear, and compression mechanical characterization tests on the materials. Half of the samples were conditioned in Pacific Ocean water for approximately 6 months at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s Marine and Coastal Research Laboratory before being returned for mechanical characterization. The mechanical testing results showed that the Ultem 9085 and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate materials experienced little to no degradation in stiffness or strength after exposure to the marine environment. On the other hand, the nylon-based materials suffered significant stiffness and strength degradation (over 50% in some cases) after environmental conditioning. Ultimately, these data sets should serve as starting points to allow marine renewable energy developers to make informed additive manufacturing material choices for their prototype deployments.

References: 1. Murdy P, Hughes S, Miller D, Presuel-Moreno F, Bonheyo G, Hernandez-Sanchez B, et al. “Subcomponent Validation of Composite Joints for the Marine Energy Advanced Materials Project.” Golden, CO, 2023. DOI: 2. “Summary Report: October 5, 2021 Workshop on Materials & Manufacturing for Marine Energy Technologies.” United States, 2022. 3. Rouway M, Tarfaoui M, Chakhchaoui N, Omari LEH, Fraija F, Cherkaoui O. “Additive Manufacturing and Composite Materials for Marine Energy: Case of Tidal Turbine.” 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing (2021). DOI: 4. Murdy P, Dolson J, Miller D, Hughes S, Beach R. “Leveraging the Advantages of Additive Manufacturing to Produce Advanced Hybrid Composite Structures for Marine Energy Systems.” Applied Sciences 11 (2021). DOI: 5. Bassett K, Carriveau R, Ting DSK. “3D printed wind turbines part 1: Design considerations and rapid manufacture potential.” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 11 (2015):186-193. DOI: 6. Post BK, Chesser PC, Roschli AC, Love LJ, Gaul KT. “Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing for Low Cost Small-Scale Wind Turbine Manufacturing.” Oak Ridge, TN, 2018. DOI: 7. Post BK, Richardson B, Lind R, Love LJ, Lloyd P, Kunc V, et al. “Big Area Additive Manufacturing Application in Wind Turbine Molds.” Austin, TX, 2017. 8. Hernandez-Sanchez BA, Gunawan B, Nicholas J, Miller D, Bonheyo G, Murdy P, et al. “Developing Materials for Marine Renewable Energy Technologies.” Albuquerque, NM, 2019. 9. Alam P, Robert C, Ó Brádaigh CM. “Tidal turbine blade composites - A review on the effects of hygrothermal aging on the properties of CFRP.” Composites Part B: Engineering 149 (2018):248-259. DOI: 10. Nunemaker JD, Voth MM, Miller DA, Samborsky DD, Murdy P, Cairns DS. “Effects of moisture absorption on damage progression and strength of unidirectional and cross-ply fiberglass-epoxy laminates.” Wind Energy Science 3 (2018):427-438. DOI: 11. Davies P, Arhant M. “Fatigue Behaviour of Acrylic Matrix Composites: Influence of Seawater.” Applied Composite Materials 26 (2019):507-518. DOI: 12. Miller DA, Samborsky DD, Stoffels MT, Voth MM, Nunemaker JD, Newhouse KJ, et al. “Summary of Marine and Hydrokinetic (MHK) Composites Testing at Montana State University.” Albuquerque, NM, 2020. DOI: 13. Jiang B, Li X, Chen S, Xiong Q, Chen B-f, Parker RG, et al. “Performance analysis and tank test validation of a hybrid ocean wave-current energy converter with a single power takeoff.” Energy Conversion and Management 224 (2020):113268. DOI: 14. Gonzalez-Montijo M, Murdy P, Candon C, Beach R, Nichols C, Barden P. “Additive manufacturing for Powering the Blue Economy applications: A tidal turbine blade case study.” European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference. Bilbao, Spain, 2023. 15. Post B, Richardson B, Lloyd P, Love L, Nolet S, Hannan J. “Additive Manufacturing of Wind Turbine Molds.” Oak Ridge, TN, 2017. DOI: 16. Celestine A-DN, Agrawal V, Runnels B. “Experimental and numerical investigation into mechanical degradation of polymers.” Composites Part B: Engineering 201 (2020):108369. DOI: 17. Grace LR, Altan MC. “Characterization of anisotropic moisture absorption in polymeric composites using hindered diffusion model.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 43 (2012):1187-96. DOI: 18. Barbero EJ. Introduction to Composite Materials Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017.

Conference: CAMX 2023

Publication Date: 2023/10/30

SKU: TP23-0000000066

Pages: 16

Price: $32.00

Get This Paper