DIGITAL LIBRARY: INCOMAT 2026 | AHMEDABAD, INDIA | MARCH 13-15

Get This Paper

A STUDY ON BALLISTIC BEHAVIOR OF UHMWPE-FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITE ARMOR AGAINST DEFORMABLE PROJECTILES

Description

Title: A STUDY ON BALLISTIC BEHAVIOR OF UHMWPE-FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITE ARMOR AGAINST DEFORMABLE PROJECTILES

Authors: Kartikeya. Kartikeya, Mohit. Garg, Rajesh. Punia,Hemant. Chouhan, Naresh. Bhatnagar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33599/GL.2026.INCOMAT.TP26-0018

Abstract: UHMWPE-fiber reinforced composites (UFRC) are exceptionally lightweight and are generally used to defeat 7.62 mm projectiles under high-velocity impact. The UFRC, upon impact, undergo shear failure, in-plane tensile failure and deformation, and out-of-plane delamination. However, the damage and failure of URFC depends upon projectile cores. In this study, two projectiles, 7.62×39 mm Mild Steel Core (MSC) and 7.62×51 mm Lead (Pb) were used to conduct multiple high-velocity impact tests on similar UFRC composite plates. The states of projectiles after tests were studied along with states of UFRC plates. It was noticed MSC projectiles were plastically deformed and Pb projectiles were completely eroded away during the impact event. The out-of-plane deformation, called as Backface Signature (BFS), was also considerably different for different projectiles. The BFS was considerably less in case of 7.62 mm MSC projectile than in case of 7.62 mm Pb projectile. A sub-laminate based numerical model of UFRC was developed to understand high-velocity impact from both projectiles. The model was able to capture plastic deformation of MSC projectiles as well as UFRC’s failure and delamination. The model was also calibrated to show complete erosion of Pb projectile during high-velocity impact event.

References: [1] I. G. Crouch, The Science of Armour Materials, 1st ed. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2017. [2] A. Bhatnagar, Lightweight Ballistic Composites: Military and Law-Enforcement Applications: Second Edition. 2016. doi: 10.1016/C2014-0-03657-X. [3] L. Iannucci, “Design of Composite Ballistic Protection Systems,” in Comprehensive Composite Materials II, vol. 8, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 308–331. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10065-7. [4] L. Iannucci and D. Pope, “High velocity impact and armour design,” Express Polym Lett, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 262–272, 2011, doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.26. [5] K. Kartikeya, H. Chouhan, K. Ram, S. Prasad, and N. Bhatnagar, “Ballistic evaluation of steel/UHMWPE composite armor system against hardened steel core projectiles,” Int J Impact Eng, vol. 164, no. September 2021, p. 104211, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104211. [6] K. Kartikeya, K. Ram, H. Chouhan, and N. Bhatnagar, “A study on deformation and failure behavior of B4C/UHMWPE composite plate subjected to high-velocity impact,” J Compos Mater, 2025, doi: 10.1177/00219983251391887. [7] L. Iannucci, S. Del Rosso, P. T. Curtis, D. J. Pope, and P. W. Duke, “Understanding the thickness effect on the tensile strength property of Dyneema®HB26 laminates,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 8, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11081431. [8] B. P. Russell, K. Karthikeyan, V. S. Deshpande, and N. A. Fleck, “The high strain rate response of Ultra High Molecular-weight Polyethylene: From fibre to laminate,” Int J Impact Eng, vol. 60, pp. 1–9, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.010. [9] K. Karthikeyan, S. Kazemahvazi, and B. P. Russell, “Optimal fibre architecture of soft-matrix ballistic laminates,” Int J Impact Eng, vol. 88, pp. 227–237, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.012. [10] J. P. Attwood, B. P. Russell, H. N. G. Wadley, and V. S. Deshpande, “Mechanisms of the penetration of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composite beams,” Int J Impact Eng, vol. 93, pp. 153–165, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.02.010. [11] J. P. Attwood et al., “The out-of-plane compressive response of Dyneema ® composites,” J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 200–226, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.017. [12] M. R. O’Masta, B. P. Russell, and W. Ronan, “Inter-ply angle influence on the out-of-plane compressive response of polyethylene fibre laminates,” Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, vol. 110, pp. 11–20, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.032. [13] J. P. Attwood, N. A. Fleck, H. N. G. Wadley, and V. S. Deshpande, “The compressive response of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibres and composites,” Int J Solids Struct, vol. 71, pp. 141–155, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.015. [14] T. R. Lässig et al., “Effect of consolidation pressure on the impact behavior of UHMWPE composites,” Compos B Eng, vol. 147, pp. 47–55, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.030. [15] K. Karthikeyan, B. P. Russell, N. A. Fleck, H. N. G. Wadley, and V. S. Deshpande, “The effect of shear strength on the ballistic response of laminated composite plates,” European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, vol. 42, pp. 35–53, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2013.04.002. [16] R. Zhang et al., “Ballistic performance of UHMWPE laminated plates and UHMWPE encapsulated aluminum structures: Numerical simulation,” Compos Struct, vol. 252, p. 112686, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112686. [17] M. K. Hazzard, R. S. Trask, U. Heisserer, M. Van Der Kamp, and S. R. Hallett, “Finite element modelling of Dyneema® composites: From quasi-static rates to ballistic impact,” Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, vol. 115, no. September, pp. 31–45, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.005. [18] Bureau of Indian Standards, “Textiles — Bullet Resistant Jackets — Performance Requirements,” IS 17051 : 2018, 2018. [19] R. Zhang et al., “Enhanced ballistic resistance of multilayered cross-ply UHMWPE laminated plates,” Int J Impact Eng, vol. 159, no. October 2021, p. 104035, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104035.

Conference: INCOMAT 2026

Publication Date: 2026/03/13

SKU: INCOMAT.TP26-0018

Pages: 10

Price: $20.00

Get This Paper