Title: A Numerical and Experimental Approach for Modeling Porosity Due to Entrapped Air and Volatiles Off-gassing During Manufacturing of Composite Structures

Authors: Curtis Hickmott, Alireza Forghani, Victoria Hutten, Evan Lorbiecki, Frank Palmieri, Brian Grimsley, Brian Coxon, Goran Fernlund, and Anoush Poursartip

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1627

Abstract: High performance composite structures have strict requirements regarding acceptable levels of porosity. The impact can be significant on mechanical performance and mitigating the growth of voids can be a challenge given the complexity of the problem. The evolution of porosity can be summarized as a balance between sources and sinks which determine void growth or shrinkage. The primary sources of void growth include bag leaks, entrapped air in the system, off-gassing of volatiles, and cure shrinkage. Mechanisms which mitigate porosity include removal of air from the system and maintaining sufficient resin pressure during the process to keep volatiles in solution. In this paper, an approach for modeling the evolution of voids due to entrapped air and volatiles is presented. It has been shown in previous experimental studies that decreases in local resin pressure are linked to a higher likelihood of porosity formation. Results of the study are compared to experiments in which the local resin pressure was measured and micrographs of the panels were taken to characterize the porosity.

References: 1. J. Wells, “Behaviour of Resin Voids in Out-of-Autoclave Prepreg Processing,” Master’s Thesis, The University of British Columbia, 2015. 2. L. Farhang, “Void evolution during processing of out-of-autoclave prepreg laminates,” PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, 2014. 3. H. Bedayat et al., “An Efficient Modelling Approach for Prediction of Porosity Severity in Composite Structures,” Proceedings of the 2017 Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE) conference. Seattle, WA. 4. H. Bedayat et al., “Numerical and Experimental Study of Local Resin Pressure for the Manufacturing of Composite Structures and the Effect on Porosity,” Proceedings of the 2018 Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE) conference. Long Beach, CA. 5. S. A. Niaki, A. Forghani, R. Vaziri, and A. Poursartip, “A two-phase integrated flow-stress process model for composites with application to highly compressible phases,” Mech. Mater., vol. 109, pp. 51–66, 2017. 6. S. Amini Niaki, “A three-phase integrated flow-stress framework for process modelling of composite materials,” PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, 2017. 7. S. A. Niaki, A. Forghani, R. Vaziri, and A. Poursartip, “A three-phase integrated flow-stress model for processing of composites,” Mechanics of Materials, 2017. 8. M. Roy, J. Kay, G. Fernlund, and A. Poursartip, “Porosity in Configured Structures,” Proceedings of the 2015 Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (SAMPE) conference. Baltimore, MD. 9. M. Roy, “Porosity in configured structures : effect of ply drops and caul sheets in the processing of composite parts,” Master’s Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2015. 10. J. Wood and M. Bader, “Void Control for Polymer-Matrix Composites (1): Theoretical and Experimental Methods for Determining the Growth and Collapse of Gas Bubbles,” Composites Manufacturing, Vol. 5 No. 3. 1994. 11. J. Wood and M. Bader, “Void Control for Polymer-Matrix Composites (2): Experimental Evaluation of a Diffusion Model for the Growth and Collapse of Gas Bubbles,” Composites Manufacturing, Vol. 5 No. 3. 1994. 12. S. M. Haghshenas, “Integrating resin flow and stress development in process modeling of thermoset composites,” PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, 2012. 13. M. A. Biot and D. G. Willis, “The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation,” J. Appl. Mech., vol. 24, pp. 594–601, Jan. 1957. 14. J. R. Rice and M. P. Cleary, “Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents,” Rev. Geophys., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 227, 1976. 15. M. A. Biot, “General theory of three-dimensional consolidation,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 155, 1941. 16. P. Hubert, “Aspects of flow and compaction of laminated composite shapes during cure,” PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia, 1996. 17. P. Hubert, R. Vaziri, and A. Poursartip, “A two-dimensional flow model for the process simulation of complex shape composite laminates,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 1999. 18. R. Lewis and B. Schrefler, Finite Element Method in the Deformation and Consolidation of Porous Media. 1998. 19. Convergent, “COMPRO.” Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017.

Conference: SAMPE 2019 - Charlotte, NC

Publication Date: 2019/05/20

SKU: TP19--1627

Pages: 14

Price: FREE