Get This Paper

A Simple Analysis Tool to Simulate the Co-cure of Honeycomb Core Composite Sandwich Structures


Title: A Simple Analysis Tool to Simulate the Co-cure of Honeycomb Core Composite Sandwich Structures

Authors: Navid Niknafs Kermani, Pavel Simacek, and Suresh G. Advani

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1432

Abstract: Honeycomb sandwich structures are fabricated using a co-cure process by bonding partially cured thermoset prepreg sheets with an adhesive layer to either side of the honeycomb core structure under a selected pressure and temperature cycle. High defect levels during the co-cure are common as the process development cycle is strongly dependent on many material and process parameters such as prepreg facesheet consolidation, adhesive bond-line fillet formation, porosity level within the prepreg and the adhesive, and core pressure evolution. In this work, a simple analysis tool is presented which can simulate these phenomena during the co-cure manufacturing of honeycomb sandwich composites. Inputs include material properties of the prepreg, adhesive and the honeycomb core and the specified pressure and temperature cycle. The tool conducts the analysis to provide the output, which includes the degree of prepreg facesheet consolidation, the porosity level at the adhesive bond-line, fillet shape of the adhesive along the core walls and the development of the core pressure. The tool should provide a better understanding of the relationships between the materials, process, and the final bond-line quality, which will result in improvement of the manufacturing process.

References: [1] Anders, M., Zebrine, D., Centea, T. and Nutt, S.R., 2019. “Process diagnostics for co-cure of sandwich structures using in situ visualization.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 116, pp.24-35. [2] Bowles, K. J., & Frimpong, S., 1992 “Void effects on the interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional graphite-fiber-reinforced composites.” Journal of Composite Materials vol. 26, no. 10 pp. 1487–1509 [3] Kizito, J., Balasubramaniam, R., Nahra, H., Agui, J. and Troung, D., 2009. “Vapor-gas bubble evolution and growth in extremely viscous fluids under vacuum.” In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (p. 1147). [4] Pearce, P. J., D. R. Arnott, A. Camilleri, M. R. Kindermann, G. I. Mathys, and A. R. Wilson. “Cause and effect of void formation during vacuum bag curing of epoxy film adhesives.” Journal of adhesion science and technology 12, no. 6 (1998): 567-584. [5] Boey, F. Y. C., and S. W. Lye. “Void reduction in autoclave processing of thermoset composites: Part 1: High pressure effects on void reduction.” Composites 23, no. 4 (1992): 261-265. [6] Hubert, P. and Poursartip, A. “Review of flow and compaction modelling relevant to thermoset matrix laminate processing.” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 17, 4 (1998), 286–318. [7] Centea, T., Simacek, P., Anders, M., Niknafs Kermani, N., Zebrine, D., Advani, S.G., and Nutt. S. ”Understanding and modeling the co-cure of honeycomb core sandwich structures” Proceedings of the SAMPE 2019 Conference, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (2019). [8] Arefmanesh, A., and S. G. Advani. “Diffusion-induced growth of a gas bubble in a viscoelastic fluid.” RheologicaActa 30,no.3(1991):274-283 [9] Niknafs Kermani, N., Simacek, P., Erdal, M., and Advani, S.G. “A numerical model to simulate void dynamics during processing of honeycomb core sandwich structures with prepreg face-sheets.” Proceedings of the 33rd Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites, American Society for Composites (2018).

Conference: SAMPE 2019 - Charlotte, NC

Publication Date: 2019/05/20

SKU: TP19--1432

Pages: 10

Price: FREE

Get This Paper