Title: Structural Health Monitoring of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Using Wireless Magnetostrictive Sensors
Authors: Sujjatul Islam, Relebohile G. Qhobosheane, Muthu R.P. Elenchenzhian, Vamsee Vadlamudi, Rassel Raihan, Kenneth Reifsnider, and Wen Shen
Abstract: Composite materials are extending the horizons of designers in all branches of engineering. These materials have numerous advantages and improved structural properties such as high strength to weight ratio, high stiffness to weight ratio, lightweight, structural strength, and excellent durability. This has led to their use in several applications i.e. automobile, aircraft, and military defense devices. However, these materials experience various types of deformations and damage modes during their service life that are at times challenging to detect. This has led to the development of various non-destructive methods for structural health monitoring (SHM) of the damages in these complex material systems. There are different methods of SHM, which include both wired and wireless techniques. Most of current wireless sensing techniques use relatively large sensors, which are difficult to embed into the composites. This paper presents a small wireless sensor made from magnetostrictive materials that allows continuous monitoring of the local condition within the composites. This sensor can be either attached on the surface of the composites or embedded within the composites. The sensor response during the tensile loading on the composites is monitored. The wireless monitoring using the magnetostrictive sensor can be a convenient in-situ method for SHM of composite structures.
References: 1. Reifsnider, K.L., Case, S.W. (2002). Durability and Damage Tolerance of Material Systems, John Wiley & Sons, NY 2. Kwun, H., & Bartels, K. A. (1998). Magnetostrictive sensor technology and its applications. Ultrasonics, 36(1-5), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00043-7 3. Olabi, A. G., & Grunwald, A. (2008). Design and application of magnetostrictive materials. Materials & Design, 29(2), 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.016 4. Zhao, X., & Lord, D. G. (2006). Application of the Villari effect to electric power harvesting. Journal of applied physics, 99(8), 08M703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2165133 5. Seco, F., Martin, J. M., Jimenez, A. R., and Calderon, L. (2005). A high accuracy magnetostrictive linear position sensor. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 123, 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2005.02.026 6. Stoyanov, P. G., and Grimes, C. A. (2000). A remote query magnetostrictive viscosity sensor. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 80(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00288-5 7. Kleinke, D. K., and Uras, H. M. (1994). A magnetostrictive force sensor. Review of Scientific Instruments, 65(5), 1699-1710. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1144863 8. Kleinke, D. K., and Mehmet Uras, H. (1993). A noncontacting magnetostrictive strain sensor. Review of scientific instruments, 64(8), 2361-2367. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1143935 9. Mitchell, E. E., DeMoyer, R., & Vranish, J. (1986). A new Metglas sensor. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, (2), 166-170. 10.1109/TIE.1986.350212 10. Klinger, T., Pfutzner, H., Schonhuber, P., Hoffmann, K., and Bachl, N. (1992). Magnetostrictive amorphous sensor for biomedical monitoring. IEEE transactions on magnetics, 28(5), 2400-2402. 10.1109/20.179505 11. Johnson, M.L., Wan, J., Huang, S., Cheng, Z., Petrenko, V.A., Kim, D.J., Chen, I.H., Barbaree, J.M., Hong, J.W. and Chin, B.A., 2008. A wireless biosensor using microfabricated phage-interfaced magnetoelastic particles. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 144(1), pp.38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2007.12.028 12. Pratt, J., and Flatau, A. B. (1995). Development and Analysis of a Self-Sensing Magnetostrictive Actuator Design. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 6(5), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9500600505
Conference: SAMPE 2019 - Charlotte, NC
Publication Date: 2019/05/20
Price: FREEGet This Paper