Title: Effect of Applied Pressure on Induction Welded Thermoplastic Composite Joint Quality and Performance

Authors: Waruna P. Seneviratne, John S. Tomblin, Brandon L. Saathoff

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.21.0486

Abstract: Growing demand for the next generation of aircraft used for commercial and defense applications has motivated the adoption of novel strategies to reduce airframe weight, manufacturing process cycle time, and overall cost. The solution for decreasing weight, cycle time, and cost often relies on the inclusion of automation and the implementation of new materials that allow advanced processing techniques to be leveraged. Reinforced thermoplastic composites are an attractive material solution for many aerospace applications due to their ability to reduce manufacturing cycle time and cost. Additionally, thermoplastic composites have superior toughness and environmental resistance compared to thermoset composites and offer the ability to eliminate or decrease the use of mechanical fasteners at joints by fusion welding. Out of various approaches, induction welding of unidirectional reinforced thermoplastic composites offers the most robust solution for scaling-up the technology for developing automated process for large structures. Due to the conductive nature of the carbon fiber reinforcement in each substrate, the material itself can be heated and welded without the addition of any foreign material at the interface of a joint to generate heat. Several critical processing parameters were identified during the initial induction welding trials, with the applied pressure playing a significant role in the quality and performance of the weld. When the material is heated, the joint must be held under enough pressure to prevent deconsolidation of the substrate, while preventing application of excessive pressure that may cause fiber distortions or resin bleed out. After the appropriate applied pressure was established, induction welded single lap shear strengths were compared to autoclave consolidated baseline strengths.

References: 1. Hagnell, M. K., Langbeck, B., Akermo, M., “Cost efficiency, integration and assembly of a generic composite aeronautical wing box,” Composite Structures, 152: 1014–1023. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.032. 2. Tracey, A. C., Dalal, H., Belcher, M. A. (Tony), Ferriell, D. R., Hall, K. L., Blohowiak, K. Y., Thomas, S. K., Blohowiak, D. A., Johnson, B. S., Grace, W. B., Voast, P. J., “Bonding the Unbondable: Thermoplastics!,” CAMX 2017 (Orlando, FL 2017), The Composites and Advanced Material Expo. 3. Shultz, K. A., Davis, A. C., “Surface Preparation Techniques for Adhesion to Aerospace Thermoplastic Composites,” SAMPE 2017 (Seattle, WA 2017), Society for the Advancement of Material Process and Engineering. 4. Baldan, A. “Review - Adhesively-bonded joints and repairs in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: Adhesives, adhesion theories and surface pretreatment,” Journals of Material Science, 2004. 5. Van Ingen, J. W., Buitenhuis, A., Van Wijngaarden, M., “Development of the Gulfstream G650 induction welded thermoplastic elevators and rudder. SAMPE 2010, (Seattle, WA 2010), Society for the Advancement of Material Process and Engineering. 6. Ageorges, C., Ye, L., Hou, M., “Advances in fusion bonding techniques for joining thermoplastic matrix composites: a review,” Composites Part A, Part A 32 (2001) 839-857. 7. Flanagan, M., Doyle, A., Doyle, K., Ward, M., Bizeul, M., Canavan, R., Weafer, B., O Bradaigh, C. M., Harrison, N. M., Goggins, J., “Comparative manufacture and testing of induction-welded and adhesively bonded carbon fibre PEEK stiffened panels,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, DOI: 10.1177/0892705718792362. 8. Yarlagadda, S., Kim, H. J., Gillespie, J. W., Shevchenko, N. B., & Fink, B. K., “A Study on the Induction Heating of Conductive Fiber Reinforced Composites. Journal of Composite Materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, 36(4), 401–421. DOI: 10.1177/0021998302036004171. 9. Grouve, W., Vruggink, E., Sacchetti, F., Akkerman, R., “Induction heating of UD C/PEKK cross-ply laminates,” 23rd International Conference on Material Forming (ESAFORM 2020), 2020. 10. Slange, T. K., Warnet, L. L., Grouve, W. J. B., Akkerman, R., “Deconsolidation of C/PEEK blanks: on the role of prepreg, blank manufacturing method and conditioning,” Composites Part A, Part A 113 (2018) 189-199. 11. ASTM D3165-07, 2014, “Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesives in Shear by Tension Loading of Single-Lap-Joint Laminated Assemblies,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, DOI: 10.1520/D3165-07R14.

Conference: SAMPE NEXUS 2021

Publication Date: 2021/06/29

SKU: TP21-0000000486

Pages: 13

Price: FREE