Title: Improving S-2 Glass/Epoxy Interfaces by a Vapor Deposited Amino-Silane

Authors: Munetaka Kubota1,2, Sanjib C Chowdhury1, Joseph M. Deitzel1, John W. Gillespie Jr.1,2,3,4,5, Giuseppe R. Palmese6, Daniel J. O’Brien7

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.22.0779

Abstract: Fiber type, reinforcement architecture, and resin dictate the properties of fiber-reinforced composites. However, often overlooked, the fiber/matrix interphase plays a critical role in composite performance. Critical flaws in the fiber cause breakage when a part is stressed. The ability to effectively redistribute load through the matrix and interphase into the neighboring fibers becomes vital. This reloading efficiency dictates whether the failing interphase finds the critical flaws in the adjacent fibers, causing the process to continue uncontrollably till the component fails. Fiber manufacturers use sizing packages, a proprietary mixture of film formers, coupling agents, lubricants, and solvents. These coatings are applied using a liquid bath approach, leading to poor control over the interphase morphology. This study explores the effectiveness of 3-aminopropyl trimethoxysilane (APS) as an adhesion promotor between S-2 glass fiber and epoxy by applying APS using a novel room-temperature vapor deposition method to create a thin and uniform silane coating directly onto the glass surface. This covalent network will allow for a direct covalent network to form between the fiber surface and the epoxy with less concern for thick silane layers building up and crosslinking. These crosslinked silane networks are detrimental to the interphase, preventing epoxy from effective diffusion into the interphase. Dynamic contact angle analysis showed strong evidence of a thin silane coating on the fiber. In addition, the fiber pullout technique tested interphase properties between S-2 glass and Dow DER353 cured with Amicure PACM. The APS coated fibers showed a 25-36% increase in interfacial shear strength over the unsized and performed similarly to the commercial sizing package. Further optimization of the coating design can potentially lead to further improvements in interphase performance.

References: 1. Chowdhury, S. C., Elder, R. M., Sirk, T. W., van Duin, A. C. T. & Gillespie, J. W. Modeling of glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane compositions using molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 82–88 (2017). 2. Ganesh, R., Sockalingam, S. & Gillespie, J. W. Dynamic effects of a single fiber break in unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Effects of matrix plasticity. J. Compos. Mater. 52, 1873–1886 (2018). 3. Ganesh, R., Sockalingam, S., Haque, B. Z. & Gillespie, J. W. Dynamic effects of single fiber break in unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites. J. Compos. Mater. 51, 1307–1320 (2017). 4. Dey, M., Deitzel, J. M., Jr, J. W. G. & Schweiger, S. Composites : Part A Influence of sizing formulations on glass / epoxy interphase properties. Compos. PART A 63, 59–67 (2014). 5. Tamrakar, S., Ganesh, R., Sockalingam, S. & Gillespie, J. W. Rate dependent mode II traction separation law for S-2 glass/epoxy interface using a microdroplet test method. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 124, (2019). 6. Chen, J., Wang, K. & Zhao, Y. Enhanced interfacial interactions of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites by regulating PEI and graphene oxide complex sizing at the interface. Compos. Sci. Technol. 154, 175–186 (2018). 7. Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Dong, Q. & Chen, D. Effect of sizing on the interfacial shear strength of carbon fiber/epoxy resin monofilament composite. Journal Wuhan University of Technology, Materials Science Edition 29, 483–487 (2014). 8. Gao, X. et al. Effect of fiber surface texture created from silane blends on the strength and energy absorption of the glass fiber/epoxy interphase. J. Compos. Mater. 42, 513–534 (2008). 9. Zhao, F. . & Takeda, N. Effect of interfacial adhesion and statistical fiber strength on tensile strength of unidirectional glass fiber/epoxy composites. Part I: experiment results. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 31, 1203–1214 (2002). 10. Madhukar, M. S. & Drzal, L. T. Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effect on Composite Mechanical Properties. III. Longitudinal (0°) Compressive Properties of Graphite/Epoxy Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 26, 310–333 (1992). 11. Gao, X. Tailored Interphase Structure For Improved Strength And Energy Absorption Of Composites. (University of Delaware, 2006). 12. Mäder, E., Grundke, K., Jacobasch, H. J. & Wachinger, G. Surface, interphase and composite property relations in fibre-reinforced polymers. Composites 25, 739–744 (1994). 13. Thomason, J. L. The interface region in glass fibre-reinforced epoxy resin composites: 3. Characterization of fibre surface coatings and the interphase. Composites 26, 487–498 (1995). 14. Berg, J. & Jones, F. R. The role of sizing resins, coupling agents and their blends on the formation of the interphase in glass fibre composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 29, 1261–1272 (1998). 15. Iglesias, J. G., González-Benito, J., Aznar, A. J., Bravo, J. & Baselga, J. Effect of glass fiber surface treatments on mechanical strength of epoxy based composite materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 250, 251–260 (2002). 16. Suzuki, N. & Ishida, H. A review on the structure and characterization techniques of silane/matrix interphases. Macromol. Symp. 108, 19–53 (1996). 17. Hamada, H., Ikuta, N., Nishida, N. & Maekawa, Z. Effect of interfacial silane network structure on interfacial strength in glass fibre composites. Composites 25, 512–515 (1994). 18. Chowdhury, S. C. & Gillespie, J. W. Silica–silane coupling agent interphase properties using molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 12981–12998 (2017). 19. Metwalli, E., Haines, D., Becker, O., Conzone, S. & Pantano, C. G. Surface characterizations of mono-, di-, and tri-aminosilane treated glass substrates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298, 825–831 (2006). 20. Cai, C., Shen, Z., Ma, S. & Xing, Y. Growth behavior and surface topography of different silane coupling agents adsorbed on the silicon dioxide substrate (0001) for vapor phase deposition. J. Mater. Sci. 42, 6108–6116 (2007). 21. Zhu, M., Lerum, M. Z. & Chen, W. How to prepare reproducible, homogeneous, and hydrolytically stable aminosilane-derived layers on silica. Langmuir 28, 416–423 (2012). 22. Ulman, A. Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 96, 1533–1554 (1996). 23. Wang, W. & Vaughn, M. W. Morphology and amine accessibility of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane films on glass surfaces. Scanning 30, 65–77 (2008). 24. Fiorilli, S. et al. Vapor-phase self-assembled monolayers of aminosilane on plasma-activated silicon substrates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 321, 235–241 (2008). 25. Zhang, F. et al. Chemical vapor deposition of three aminosilanes on silicon dioxide: Surface characterization, stability, effects of silane concentration, and cyanine dye adsorption. Langmuir 26, 14648–14654 (2010). 26. Ritter, H., Nieminen, M., Karppinen, M. & Brühwiler, D. A comparative study of the functionalization of mesoporous silica MCM-41 by deposition of 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane from toluene and from the vapor phase. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 121, 79–83 (2009). 27. Yadav, A. R., Sriram, R., Carter, J. A. & Miller, B. L. Comparative study of solution-phase and vapor-phase deposition of aminosilanes on silicon dioxide surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. C (2014). doi:10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.017 28. Vandenberg, E. T. et al. Structure of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane on silicon oxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. (1991). doi:10.1016/0021-9797(91)90139-Y 29. Hinton, Z. R. et al. High Throughput Carbon Fiber Surface Modification. in SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings 2019-May, (Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, 2019). 30. Fang, J.-S., Yang, T.-M., Cheng, Y.-L. & Chen, G.-S. (3-Aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane Self-Assembled Monolayer as Barrier of Porous SiOCH for Electroless Cu Metallization: Optimizations of SiOCH Hydroxylation and Monolayer Functionalization. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 10, 023003 (2021). 31. Allen, G. C., Sorbello, F., Altavilla, C., Castorina, A. & Ciliberto, E. Macro-, micro- and nano-investigations on 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane self-assembly-monolayers. Thin Solid Films 483, 306–311 (2005). 32. Gorowara, R. L. Interphase Formation and Environmental Degradation in Glass Fiber/Vinyl Ester Composites. (2001). doi:10.16953/deusbed.74839 33. Désarmot, G. & Favre, J. P. Advances in pull-out testing and data analysis. Compos. Sci. Technol. 42, 151–187 (1991). 34. Zhandarov, S. et al. Investigation of interfacial strength parameters in polymer matrix composites: Compatibility and reproducibility. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 1, 82–92 (2018). 35. Miller, B., Muri, P. & Rebenfeld, L. A Microbond Method for Determination of the Shear Strength of a FiberResin Interface.pdf. Compos. Sci. Technol. 28, 17–32 (1987).

Conference: SAMPE 2022

Publication Date: 2022/05/23

SKU: TP22-0000000779

Pages: 13

Price: $26.00