Title: Mechanical Characterization of Graphene Nanoplatelets Integrated Non-Crimp Carbon Fiber Laminated Composite Laminates

Authors: Vishwas S. Jadhav, Ajit D. Kelkar

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.22.0816

Abstract: The use of lightweight composite materials has increased exponentially during the last few decades. The lightweight structural composite components are typically manufactured using an epoxy-based matrix. Non-Crimp Fabric (NCF) provides excellent mechanical properties, and the fabrication cost is substantially lower than conventional composite manufacturing methods. The matrix forms a thin layer between the fibers which bonds, transfers force, and displace adjacent layers. Compared to carbon fibers, the strength and stiffness of the matrix are much lower. When the structure is subjected out of plane loading, the matrix layer tends to fail and separates from the adjoining fiber layers. Eventually, the separation of layers forms stress concentration resulting in interlaminar delaminations in the composite laminates.

To enhance the matrix properties, nanomaterials are added to the epoxy system. Due to their high aspect ratio superior properties, the carbon nanofillers such as carbon nanoparticles, Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs), Carbon Nano Fibers (CNFs), Graphene nanoparticles/ nanoplatelets (GnP’s) incorporated epoxy composites offer new avenues to improve the multifunctional properties of polymer matrix composites. Most of the researchers used epoxy nanocomposites to investigate the properties of the inclusion of nanoparticles into the composite. One of the challenges of using these nanomaterials is the dispersion without agglomeration. The study indicates that using the traditional Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Method (VARTM) process is difficult to fabricate the nanoengineered composite laminate, as nanoengineered epoxy blocks resin flow when it enters the micro gap between the fibers. In the present research, the laminates were manufactured by first fabricating nanoengineered prepregs to overcome these challenges. GnP’s of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 % weight of matrix respectively were used to formulate nanoengineered prepregs using hand layup prepreg fabrication technique and were semi-cured using a mechanical press. These prepregs were then used to fabricate the nanoengineered composite laminate. Static tension tests were performed to investigate the effects of graphene nanoplatelets loading on the modulus, strength, and Mode I fracture toughness test was performed to find interlaminar fracture toughness. The impact of GnP’s loading on the Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) was estimated using Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA).

References: 1. Jadhav V, Kelkar A. Fabrication, Processing and Characterization of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Laminated Composite Embedded with Graphene Lattice Sheets. Proc ASME 2021 Int Mech Eng Congr Expo IMECE2021. Published online 2021:1-9. 2. Imran KA, Shivakumar KN. Graphene-modified carbon/epoxy nanocomposites: Electrical, thermal and mechanical properties. doi:10.1177/0021998318780468 3. Saeger KJ, Lagace PA, Shim DJ. Interlaminar Stresses Due to In-Plane. J Compos Mater. 2007;36(02):211-227. doi:10.1106/002199802023548 4. Yao XF, Yeh HY, Zhao HP. Dynamic response and fracture characterization of polymer-clay nanocomposites with mode-I crack. J Compos Mater. 2005;39(16):1487-1496. doi:10.1177/0021998305050437 5. Xu Y, Hong W, Bai H, Li C, Shi G. Strong and ductile poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide composite films with a layered structure. Carbon N Y. 2009;47(15):3538-3543. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.022 6. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Srivastava I, et al. Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites. Small. 2010;6(2):179-183. doi:10.1002/smll.200901480 7. Kelkar AD, Mohan R, Bolick R, Shendokar S. Effect of nanoparticles and nanofibers on Mode I fracture toughness of fiber glass reinforced polymeric matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng B. 2010;168(1-3):85-89. doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2010.01.015 8. Shendokar S, Kelkar A, Bolick R. Application of electrospun nanofibers for the improvements in mode-I fracture toughness of fiberglass composites. Proc Int Conf Nanosci Eng Technol ICONSET 2011. Published online 2011:5-10. doi:10.1109/ICONSET.2011.6167898 9. Srivastava VK, Gries T, Veit D, Quadflieg T, Mohr B, Kolloch M. Effect of nanomaterial on mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of woven carbon fabric reinforced polymer composites. Eng Fract Mech. 2017;180:73-86. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.030 10. Tang LC, Wan YJ, Yan D, et al. The effect of graphene dispersion on the mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon N Y. 2013;60:16-27. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.050 11. Mishra K, Bastola KP, Singh RP, Vaidyanathan R. Effect of graphene oxide on the interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Polym Eng Sci. 2019;59(6):1199-1208. doi:10.1002/pen.25100 12. Mishra K, Babu LK, Vaidyanathan R. Influence of POSS-PVP in Modification of CFRP Interlaminar Fracture Toughness. J Appl Mech Eng,. 2019;8:1-6. doi:10.35248/2168-9873.19.8.318 13. Bora C, Gogoi P, Baglari S, Dolui SK. Preparation of polyester resin/graphene oxide nanocomposite with improved mechanical strength. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;129(6):3432-3438. doi:10.1002/app.39068 14. Zhang H, Liu Y, Kuwata M, Bilotti E, Peijs T. Improved fracture toughness and integrated damage sensing capability by spray coated CNTs on carbon fibre prepreg. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;70:102-110. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.029 15. Garcia EJ, Wardle BL, John Hart A. Joining prepreg composite interfaces with aligned carbon nanotubes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2008;39(6):1065-1070. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.011 16. Khan SU, Kim J-K. Improved interlaminar shear properties of multiscale carbon fiber composites with bucky paper interleaves made from carbon nanofibers. Carbon N Y. 2012;50(14):5265-5277. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.011 17. Wang X, Melly SK, Li N, et al. Helical milling response of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite with carbon nanotube buckypaper interlayer. Polym Polym Compos. 2020;28(6):378-387. doi:10.1177/0967391119879296 18. Li N, Wang G dong, Melly SK, et al. Interlaminar properties of GFRP laminates toughened by CNTs buckypaper interlayer. Compos Struct. 2019;208(August 2018):13-22. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.002 19. Chen C, Li Y, Yu T. Interlaminar toughening in flax fiber-reinforced composites interleaved with carbon nanotube buckypaper. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2014;33(20):1859-1868. doi:10.1177/0731684414548084 20. Jadhav V, Kelkar A. Performance Evaluation of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Laminated Composite Embedded with Graphene Lattice Sheets. CAMX – Compos Adv Mater Expo CAMX Conf Proceedings Dallas, TX, Oct 19-21, 2021 CAMX – Compos Adv Mater Expo. Published online 2021:1-12. 21. Jadhav VS, Kelkar AD. Effect Of Curing Temperature On The Fundamental Properties Of Laminated Composites Fabricated Using Plain Weave And Non Crimp Fiber And Epoxy Resin. CAMX 2019,23-26 Sept 2019. Published online 2019. 22. Islam AI, Kelkar AD. An Assessment Of Cure Kinetics Of Epon 862-W Epoxy Resin System In The Presence Of Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers During The Fabrication Of Nanoengineered Prepregs.; 2017. 23. Thunhorst KL, Hine AM, Sedgwick P, Huehn MR, Goetz DP. The effect of nanosilica concentration on the enhancement of epoxy matrix resins for filament-wound composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Int SAMPE Tech Conf. Published online 2011. 24. ASTM. Astm D3039/D3039M. Annu B ASTM Stand. Published online 2014:1-13. doi:10.1520/D3039 25. Jadhav, Vishwas S. Kelkar A. IMECE2021-71191. Published online 2021:1-9. 26. Jadhav V, Kelkar A. IMECE2019-11441. Proc ASME 2019 Int Mech Eng Congr Expo. Published online 2019:1-6. 27. ASTM D5528-01. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Am Stand Test Methods. 2014;03(Reapproved 2007):1-12. doi:10.1520/D5528-13.2

Conference: SAMPE 2022

Publication Date: 2022/05/23

SKU: TP22-0000000816

Pages: 14

Price: $28.00