Title: UNDERSTANDING INTERLAMINAR BONDING AND FRACTURE TOUGHNESS IN IN-SITU CONSOLIDATED AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT OF CARBON FIBER LM-PAEK COMPOSITES
Authors: Nathaniel . Heathman, Joseph G Kirchhoff, Timothy Yap, Mehran Tehrani
DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.23.0058
Abstract: Fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites (TPC) are advantageous due to their out-of-autoclave processability, higher toughness, recyclability, weldability, and ease of repair. Yet, difficulty manufacturing at scale has limited their application in the aerospace industry. Developing high rate in situ consolidation automated fiber placement of TPCs (ICAT) is essential to realize TPC’s potential. Recent studies by the authors have investigated how processing parameters affect interlaminar bonding, void development, and crystallinity in ICAT parts. This study aims to further our understanding of bond strength and fracture toughness in ICAT parts. A laser powered Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) machine, built in-house, is used to manufacture ICAT Short Beam Shear (SBS) and Mode II fracture toughness coupons from carbon fiber reinforced low-melt Polyarlyletherketone (LM-PAEK) quarter inch tapes. Processing parameters were varied to fabricate specimens at two different sets of bonding strengths and crystallinities: one specimen with both a high bonding strength (58 MPa) and high crystallinity (23%), the other with low bonding strength (41 MPa) and low crystallinity (9%). The two sample sets were evaluated based upon their interlaminar bonding strength, mode II fracture toughness, crystallinity, void content, and failure modes. Results from all testing provided insight on how differing bonding and crystallinity levels affect fracture toughness and failure mechanisms in ICAT samples. High quality ICAT parts (>1% void content) with mode II fracture toughness values on par with compression molded samples and relatively high SBS strength (60% of compression molded samples) are demonstrated.
References: [1] A. Brasington, C. Sacco, J. Halbritter, R. Wehbe, and R. Harik, “Automated fiber placement: A review of history, current technologies, and future paths forward,” Compos. Part C Open Access, vol. 6, p. 100182, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100182. [2] M. H. Nguyen, A. A. Vijayachandran, P. Davidson, D. Call, D. Lee, and A. M. Waas, “Effect of automated fiber placement (AFP) manufacturing signature on mechanical performance of composite structures,” Compos. Struct., vol. 228, p. 111335, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111335. [3] M. Di Francesco, L. Veldenz, G. Dell’Anno, and K. Potter, “Heater power control for multi-material, variable speed Automated Fibre Placement,” Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 101, pp. 408–421, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.015. [4] E. Oromiehie, A. K. Gain, and B. G. Prusty, “Processing parameter optimisation for automated fibre placement (AFP) manufactured thermoplastic composites,” Compos. Struct., vol. 272, p. 114223, Sep. 2021, doi: 10/gkdskb. [5] C. M. Stokes-Griffin and P. Compston, “The effect of processing temperature and placement rate on the short beam strength of carbon fibre–PEEK manufactured using a laser tape placement process,” Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 78, pp. 274–283, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.008. [6] I. Schiel, L. Raps, A. R. Chadwick, I. Schmidt, M. Simone, and S. Nowotny, “An investigation of in-situ AFP process parameters using CF/LM-PAEK,” Adv. Manuf. Polym. Compos. Sci., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 191–197, Oct. 2020, doi: 10/gpc35n. [7] N. Heathman, P. Koirala, T. Yap, A. Emami, and M. Tehrani, “In situ consolidation of carbon fiber PAEK via laser-assisted automated fiber placement,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 249, p. 110405, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110405. [8] Z. Qureshi, T. Swait, R. Scaife, and H. M. El-Dessouky, “In situ consolidation of thermoplastic prepreg tape using automated tape placement technology: Potential and possibilities,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 66, pp. 255–267, Nov. 2014, doi: 10/gj3bpm. [9] A. K. Bandaru, G. J. Clancy, D. Peeters, R. O’Higgins, and P. M. Weaver, “Interface Characterization of Thermoplastic Skin-Stiffener Composite Manufactured using Laser-Assisted Tape Placement,” in 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, Jan. 2018. doi: 10.2514/6.2018-0481. [10] E. Oromiehie, A. K. Gain, M. J. Donough, and B. G. Prusty, “Fracture toughness assessment of CF-PEEK composites consolidated using hot gas torch assisted automated fibre placement,” Compos. Struct., vol. 279, p. 114762, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114762. [11] D. Ray et al., “Fracture toughness of carbon fiber/polyether ether ketone composites manufactured by autoclave and laser-assisted automated tape placement,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., p. n/a-n/a, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1002/app.41643. [12] J. Audoit, L. Rivière, J. Dandurand, A. Lonjon, E. Dantras, and C. Lacabanne, “Thermal, mechanical and dielectric behaviour of poly(aryl ether ketone) with low melting temperature,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 2147–2157, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10973-018-7292-x. [13] Yap, Timothy, Tamijani, Ali, and Tehrani, Mehran, “Effects of Tape Staggering Pattern on Interlaminar Strength and Surface Quality of In-situ Consolidated Automated Fiber Placement Thermoplastic Composites,” AIAA SciTech, 2023. [14] Evelyn Lian, “Medium Toughness PAEK thermoplastics Toray Cetex TC1225 (LM-PAEK) T700 12K T1E Unidirectional Tap 145 gsm 34% RC Qualification Material Property Data Report.” Wichita State University National Institute for Aviation Research, Feb. 21, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.wichita.edu/industry_and_defense/NIAR/Documents/CAM-RP-2019-036-Rev-NC-February-21-2020-MPDR.PDF [15] Toray Advanced Composites, “Toray Cetex TC1225 Data Sheet.” [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3JtGQ0m
Conference: SAMPE 2023
Publication Date: 2023/04/17
SKU: TP23-0000000058
Pages: 17
Price: $34.00
Get This Paper