Get This Paper




Authors: Nima Bakhshi, Xiulun Yin, Ziqiang Chen, John D.W. Madden, Anoush Poursartip

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.23.0189

Abstract: Automation has driven significant advances in aerospace composites manufacturing. However, there is room for improvement of robust, efficient, and cost-effective methods to manufacture structures at higher production rates. It is argued here that through a balanced integration of a science-based framework representing materials and processes, with instrumentation and automated control technologies, the current challenges can be better addressed. An example of this integrated approach is applied to Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) as a case study. Currently, a considerable gap exists in terms of technology and process representation between the state-of-the-art of tack characterization methods and research AFP systems. This work bridges this gap by developing a table-top AFP demonstrator that can accurately simulate the tow deposition process and perform custom operations such as in-situ peel tests. A smart roller technology is developed to measure crucial process parameters at the AFP process nip point, in-situ. The sense-think-act framework is applied in a material- and process-centric approach to integrate the material state as measured during the process into the control of the AFP system. Sensor data is analyzed through a physics-based framework, that includes physics-based material and process models and simulations, to develop control strategies based on system feedback.

References: [1] “Composites Market Report: Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis.” Lucintel, 2019. [2] R. Young, “Hi-Rate Composite Aircraft Manufacturing (HiCAM) Project Overview,” Dec. 2020. [Online]. Available: [3] J. Russell, “Addressing great need for automation of composites.” [4] D. H.-J. A. Lukaszewicz, C. Ward, and K. D. Potter, “The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: History, present and future,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 997–1009, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.003. [5] ASTM D8336-21, “Standard Test Method for Characterizing Tack of Prepregs Using a Continuous Application-and-Peel Procedure.” 2021. [6] R. J. Crossley, “Characterisation of tack for automated tape laying,” PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2011. [Online]. Available: [7] R. Crossley, P. Schubel, and N. Warrior, “The experimental determination of prepreg tack and dynamic stiffness,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 423–434, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.014. [8] R. J. Crossley, P. J. Schubel, and N. A. Warrior, “Experimental determination and control of prepreg tack for automated manufacture,” Plastics, Rubber and Composites, vol. 40, no. 6–7, pp. 363–368, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1179/174328910X12777566997810. [9] R. J. Crossley, P. J. Schubel, and D. S. A. De Focatiis, “Time–temperature equivalence in the tack and dynamic stiffness of polymer prepreg and its application to automated composites manufacturing,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 52, pp. 126–133, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.002. [10] A. Endruweit et al., “Characterisation of tack for uni-directional prepreg tape employing a continuous application-and-peel test method,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 114, pp. 295–306, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.027. [11] A. Forghani et al., “A Physics-Based Modelling Framework for Simulation of Prepreg Tack in AFP,” Proceedings of the Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering – North America, Seattle, WA, 2017, [Online]. Available: [12] A. Forghani et al., “Experimental Calibration of a Numerical Model of Prepreg Tack for Predicting AFP Process Related Defects,” Proceedings of the Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering – North America, Long Beach, CA, 2018, [Online]. Available: [13] M. L. Williams, R. F. Landel, and J. D. Ferry, “The Temperature Dependence of Relaxation Mechanisms in Amorphous Polymers and Other Glass-forming Liquids,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 77, no. 14, pp. 3701–3707, Jul. 1955, doi: 10.1021/ja01619a008. [14] C. Wohl et al., “Tack measurements of prepreg tape at variable temperature and humidity,” in CAMX Conference Proceedings, Orlando, FL, Dec. 2017. [15] D. Adams, “Composite prepreg tack testing.”

Conference: SAMPE 2023

Publication Date: 2023/04/17

SKU: TP23-0000000189

Pages: 15

Price: $30.00

Get This Paper