Search

DIGITAL LIBRARY: SAMPE 2023 | SEATTLE, WA | APRIL 17-20

Get This Paper

ON THE NEED FOR INCLUSION OF PHYSICAL AGING IN NEXT GENERATION CURE KINETICS MODELS

Description

Title: ON THE NEED FOR INCLUSION OF PHYSICAL AGING IN NEXT GENERATION CURE KINETICS MODELS

Authors: Sherry Kiafar, Anoush Poursartip

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.23.0219

Abstract: Currently, best practice for cure cycle design of thermoset matrix composite structures includes cure kinetics modelling for an optimal outcome, e.g., a fast cycle that does not exotherm, or an intermediate hold for on/off tool processing. Smarter and more complex cure cycles, as well as newer resin chemistries require better cure kinetics and associated material models. The focus of our work is the inclusion of the impact of physical aging in these material models for improved thermoset cure simulation. Physical aging is the spontaneous attempt of the material at the glassy state to regain the thermodynamic equilibrium state. Physical aging leads to a reduction of thermodynamic properties such as volume, enthalpy, and entropy. In this study, the influence of physical aging on cure reaction kinetics and the heat capacity of the material have been investigated. Temperature Modulated Differential Scanning Calorimetry (TMDSC) experiments were performed on Hexcel 8552 neat resin. Resin samples were partially cured in the DSC, and physical aging was systematically introduced into the system by annealing the samples in the glassy state for varying predetermined aging times. The subsequent TMDSC heating scan results reveal that the glass transition dynamics of the aged material is different than that of the unaged or rejuvenated samples and must be incorporated into next generation material models to properly capture the material behaviour when physical aging occurs.

References: [1] Hubert, P., Johnston, A., Poursartip, A., & Nelson, K. “Cure Kinetics and Viscosity Models for Hexcel 8552 Epoxy Resin.” Proceedings of 29th International SAMPE Tech. Conf. Long Beach, California, May 6-10, 2001. Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering. Pp. 2341-2354 [2] Simon, S.L., McKenna, G., & Sindt, O. “Modeling the evolution of the dynamic mechanical properties of a commercial epoxy during cure after gelation.” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 76 (2000): 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000425)76:4>495::AID-APP7<3.0.CO;2-B [3] Fernlund, G., Mobuchon, C., Zobeiry, N. “Autoclave processing” Comprehensive composite materials II. Ed. Beaumont, P., & Zweben, C. Elsevier, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09899-4 [4] Kratz, J., Hsiao, K., Fernlund, G., & Hubert, P. “Thermal models for MTM45-1 and Cycom 5320 out-of-autoclave prepreg resins.” Journal of Composite Materials 47 (2013): 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998312440131 [5] Zobeiry, N., Forghani, A., Li, C., Gordnian, K., Thorpe, R., Vaziri, R., Fernlund, G., & Poursartip, A. “Multiscale characterization and representation of composite materials during processing.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0278 [6] Prasatya, P., McKenna, G., & Simon, S. “A viscoelastic model for predicting isotropic residual stresses in thermosetting materials: Effects of processing parameters.” Journal of Composite Materials 35 (2001): 826-848. https://doi.org/10.1177/a037322 [7] Svanberg, J., Holmberg, J. “Prediction of shape distortions Part I. FE-implementation of a path dependent constitutive model.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 35 (2004): 711-721 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.005 [8] Simon, S.L., Mckenna, G.B., & Sint, O. “Modeling the Evolution of the Dynamic Mechanical Properties of a Commercial Epoxy during Cure after Gelation.” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 76.4 (2000): 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000425)76:4>495::AID-APP7<3.0.CO;2-B [9] Zobeiry, N., Vaziri, R., Poursartip, A. “Computationally efficient pseudo-viscoelastic models for evaluation of residual stresses in thermoset polymer composites during cure.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 41 (2010): 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.009 [10] Khoun, Karine. “Process-induced stresses and deformations in woven composites manufactured by Resin Transfer Moulding.” Thesis, McGill University, 2009. [11] Lee, C., Tienda, K.A., & Storage, T. “Experimental methods and material model development for a toughened epoxy.” SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings. Seattle, Washington, June 2-5, 2014. Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering. [12] Struzziero, G., Remy, B., & Skordos, A.A. "Measurement of thermal conductivity of epoxy resins during cure." Journal of Applied Polymer Science 136.5 (2019): 47015. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47015 [13] Chen, C., Poursartip, A. & Fernlund, G. “Cure-dependent microstructures and their effect on elastic properties of interlayer toughened thermoset composites.” Composites Science and Technology 197 (2020): 108241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108241 [14] Chen, C., Nesbitt, S., Reiner, J., Vaziri, R., Poursartip, A. & Fernlund, G. “Cure path dependency of static and dynamic mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of interlayer toughened composite laminates.” Composites Science and Technology 200 (2020): 108444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108444 [15] Chen, C., Poursartip, A. & Fernlund, G. “Influence of the glass transition of interlaminar particles on shear behaviour during cure of interlayer toughened thermoset composites.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 147 (2021): 106447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106447 [16] Cangialosi, Daniele “Physical Aging of Polymers,” Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst015.pub2 [17] McKenna, G. B. “Physical aging in glasses and composites.” Long-Term Durability of Polymeric Matrix Composites. Boston, MA: Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9308-3_7 [18] Hutchinson, John M. “Physical aging of polymers.” Progress in Polymer Science 20 (1995): 703-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6700(94)00001-I [19] Huang, Y., Wang, X., & Paul, D. R. “Physical aging of thin glassy polymer films: Free volume interpretation.” Journal of Membrane Science 277 (2006): 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.032 [20] Odegard, G.M., & Bandyopadhyay, A. “Physical Aging of Epoxy Polymers and Their Composites.” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 49 (2011): 1695-1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22384 [21] Lee, A., & McKenna, G. “Effect of crosslink density on physical ageing of epoxy networks.” Polymer 29 (1988): 1812-1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(88)90396-5 [22] Wang, X., & Gillham, J. “Physical aging in the glassy state of a thermosetting system vs. extent of cure.” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 47 (1993): 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070470307 [23] Hexcel Composites Ltd, Safety Data Sheet HexPly 8552 Resin,Duxford, Cambridge, UK. [24] Ballout, W., Coulon, B., Janssens, Y., Van Velthem, P., Sclavons, M., Magnin, D., Pardoen, T., & Bailly, C. “Quantitative Characterization of Interdiffusion at the Resin–Resin and Resin–Prepreg Interphases of Epoxy Systems Processed by Model SQ-RTM.” Polymer Engineering & Science 56 (2016): 969-1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24338 [25] Convergent Manufacturing Technologies, “Raven Simulation Software.” www.convergent.ca. Vancouver, Canada. https://www.convergent.ca/products/raven-simulation-software. 2019. [26] Shahkarami, A., Van Ee, D., & Poursartip, A. “Material Characterization for Processing: Hexcel 8552.” NCAMP (National Center for Advanced Materials Performance)

Conference: SAMPE 2023

Publication Date: 2023/04/17

SKU: TP23-0000000219

Pages: 12

Price: $24.00

Get This Paper