Get This Paper




Authors: Seunghyun Ko, Yao Qiao, Jose L. Ramos, Wenbin Kuang, Adam C. Denny, Timothy J. Roosendaal, Kevin L. Simmons

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.23.0309

Abstract: Extending the lifecycle of traditional carbon or glass fiber-reinforced plastics is a complicated problem. The lack of sustainability limits the applications of the traditional composite materials in the vehicle industries where recycling and repurposing are critical issues. Alternatives for the low-stressed structural components are polymer fiber-reinforced plastics (PFRPs). In PFRPs, both the fibers and matrix are composed of thermoplastic polymers (e.g. polypropylene or polyethylene, etc). They are lightweight, easy to manufacture, and cost-effective. Additionally, recycling and repurposing thermoplastic polymers are well understood. Therefore, the PFRPs have strong advantages compared to the traditional fiber-reinforced composites in low-stressed structural applications.
In this study, we investigated the low-velocity impact (LVI) performances of the PFRPs and compared them with carbon fiber-reinforced plastics (CFRPs). A semi-spherical impactor was dropped to flat, square panels, and the absorbed impact energy was measured. The damage mechanisms were examined using a X-ray μCT scan. The PFRPs outperformed the CFRPs in terms of perforation energy normalized by plate thickness and density. After the perforation, we healed the fractured plates by leveraging the recyclability of the thermoplastic polymers. The healing process of the panels was identical to the initial panel manufacturing process. No additional materials were added during the healing process. The healed PFRP panels were impacted again and substantially recovered energy absorption capability.
We also conducted the repeated-impact test with several different impact energies. Unlike the CFRPs where the impact peak load decreased as the impacts repeated, the PFRPs showed an increasing trend. Such a unique mechanism was due to the strain-hardening behavior of the polymer fibers and matrix. As a result, the repeated-impact life of the PFRPs was significantly enhanced. These results are particularly interesting in the automotive or aerospace industries where repeated LVI is frequently observed.

References: 1. Qiao, Y., Fring, L.D., Pallaka, M.R. and Simmons, K.L., 2022. A review of the fabrication methods and mechanical behavior of continuous thermoplastic polymer fiber–thermoplastic polymer matrix composites. Polymer Composites. 2. Santos, R.A., Gorbatikh, L. and Swolfs, Y., 2021. Commercial self-reinforced composites: A comparative study. Composites Part B: Engineering, 223, p.109108. 3. Gao, C., Yu, L., Liu, H. and Chen, L., 2012. Development of self-reinforced polymer composites. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(6), pp.767-780. 4. Kmetty, Á., Bárány, T. and Karger-Kocsis, J., 2010. Self-reinforced polymeric materials: A review. Progress in Polymer Science, 35(10), pp.1288-1310. 5. Karger-Kocsis, J. and Bárány, T., 2014. Single-polymer composites (SPCs): Status and future trends. Composites Science and Technology, 92, pp.77-94. 6. Tuttle, M.E., 2003. Structural analysis of polymeric composite materials. Crc Press. 7. Bažant, Z.P., Le, J.L. and Salviato, M., 2021. Quasibrittle fracture mechanics and size effect: A first course. Oxford University Press. 8. Alcock, B., Cabrera, N.O., Barkoula, N.M. and Peijs, T., 2006. Low velocity impact performance of recyclable all-polypropylene composites. Composites Science and Technology, 66(11-12), pp.1724-1737. 9. Aurrekoetxea, J., Sarrionandia, M., Mateos, M. and Aretxabaleta, L., 2011. Repeated low energy impact behaviour of self-reinforced polypropylene composites. Polymer testing, 30(2), pp.216-221. 10. Boria, S., Scattina, A. and Belingardi, G., 2017. Impact behavior of a fully thermoplastic composite. Composite Structures, 167, pp.63-75. 11. Boria, S., Scattina, A. and Belingardi, G., 2019. Experimental investigation on a fully thermoplastic composite subjected to repeated impacts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 233(19-20), pp.6985-7002. 12. Cantwell, W.J. and Morton, J., 1990. Impact perforation of carbon fibre reinforced plastic. Composites science and technology, 38(2), pp.119-141. 13. Evci, C. and Gülgeç, M., 2012. An experimental investigation on the impact response of composite materials. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 43, pp.40-51. 14. Bunsell, A.R. ed., 2018. Handbook of properties of textile and technical fibres. Woodhead Publishing. 15. Spathis, G. and Kontou, E., 1998. Experimental and theoretical description of the plastic behaviour of semicrystalline polymers. Polymer, 39(1), pp.135-142. 16. Haward, R.N., 2007. Strain hardening of high density polyethylene. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 45(9), pp.1090-1099.

Conference: SAMPE 2023

Publication Date: 2023/04/17

SKU: TP23-0000000309

Pages: 9

Price: $18.00

Get This Paper