Search

DIGITAL LIBRARY: SAMPE 2024 | LONG BEACH, CA | MAY 20-23

Get This Paper

Ai-Enabled Automatic Inspection in Wind Turbine Blade Manufacturing: Technology Validation and Demonstration

Description

Title: Ai-Enabled Automatic Inspection in Wind Turbine Blade Manufacturing: Technology Validation and Demonstration

Authors: Juan Su & Scott Blake

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.24.0135

Abstract: Current best practice in the manufacture of large wind turbine blades is labor-intensive and includes manual in-process inspection of composites layup. This approach leaves blade manufacturing subject to human errors that, if left uncorrected, compromise the mechanical integrity of the blade. To minimize undetected layup errors, a developmental project is underway to adapt machine vision-based automatic inspection technology to the challenging process of wind blade manufacturing and the harsh environs of an industrial facility. This paper discusses the demands that blade manufacturing places on automatic inspection technology, including large focal distances and fields of view, environmental variability such as vibration and luminosity levels within the production facility, capture of ultra-high quality images, AI-enabled real-time image analysis and feedback for corrective actions, and documentation that includes stitching of images to generate a panoramic representation of the entire blade. The paper also reports on the current status of a developmental project to validate and demonstrate the technology (TRL 4) for rapid advancement into an industrial environment (TRL 5-7).

References: 1.M. Garcia, “Boeing 737-9 Max Grounding: FAA Leaves No Room for ‘Quality Escapes.’” Forbes 12 January 2024. https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisagarcia/2024/01/12/boeing-737-9-max-grounding-faa-leaves-no-room-for-quality-escapes/?sh=2dd60b451681 2.J. Su, S. Stapleton, S. Johnson, S. Nolet, N. Althoff and J. Sherwood, “Effects of Localized Manufacturing-Induced Defects in Wind Turbine Blades,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Composites, Thirty-third Technical Conference (2018). DOI: 10.12783/asc33/26068 3.P. Veers, C. Bottasso, L. Manuel, J. Naughton, L. Pao, J. Paquette, A. Robertson, M. Robinson, S. Ananthan, T. Barlas, A. Bianchini, H. Bredmose, S. Horcas, J. Keller, H. Madsen, J. Manwell, P. Moriarty, S. Nolet and J. Rinker, “Grand Challenges in the Design, Manufacture, and Operation of Future Wind Turbine Systems.” Wind Energy Science (2023) 8:1071-1131. DOI: 10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023. 4.J. Su and J. Sherwood, “Effects of Localized Manufacturing-Induced Porosity Defects on the Fatigue of Wind Turbine Blades—Experiment and Modeling.” American Society for Composites 2019 (2019). 5.Stephen Johnson, Interview by Karen Mason, 16 January 2024. 6.L. Mishnaevsky, Jr., “Root Causes and Mechanisms of Failure of Wind Turbine Blades: Overview.” Materials (2022) 15(9), 2959. DOI: 10.3390/ma15092959.. 7.M. Leong, L. Overgaard, O. Thomsen, E. Lund, I. Daniel, “Investigation of Failure Mechanisms in GFRP Sandwich Structures with Face Sheet Wrinkle Defects Used for Wind Turbine Blades.” Compos. Struct. (2012) 94: 768-78. 8.C. Richard, “Siemens Gamesa to Focus on European Onshore Wind and Fixing 5.X Turbine Platform.” WindPower Monthly, 21 November 2023. 9.U. Khan, J. Iqbal and M. Khan, “Automatic Inspection System Using Machine Vision.” 34th Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop (APR’05) (2005) 6-217. DOI: 10.1109/AIPR.2005.20. 10.S. Blake and A. Atai, “Accelerating In-Process Automatic Inspection Engineering: Removing Inhibitors to Rapid Machine Learning-Based Application Development.” SAMPE Conference January 2021. DOI:10.33599/nasampe/s.21.0472 11.Aligned Vision, “How to Expedite the Qualification Process for New Quality Monitoring Technology.” Posted 30 November 2022, https://aligned-vision.com/how-to-expedite-the-qualification-process-for-new-quality-monitoring-technology/

Conference: SAMPE 2024

Publication Date: 2024/05/20

SKU: TP24-0000000135

Pages: 14

Price: $28.00

Get This Paper