Title: Manufacture of Composite Tube Spar Wing Assembly Manufacturing Demonstration Units with Matrix Reflow Joints

Authors: Richard Larson, Tyler Hudson, Brian Mason, Jacob Martin, Daniel Drake

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.25.0064

Abstract: The manufacturing process for a tubular spar wing assembly is presented with focus on a novel spar-to-skin bonding technique. Two manufacturing demonstration units (MDU) are described. Each MDU consisted of two tubular spars bonded to a skin panel. Both composite spars had the same laminate configuration but were manufactured by different methods. In this study, three of the four spars were created by using steel clamshell tooling. Plies were laid down onto two halves of the steel clamshell tools and then spliced together when the tools were closed together; next the plies were envelope-bagged to the steel tools and cured in the autoclave. The last spar was manufactured by wrapping plies around a wash-out mandrel, which was removed after cure. The wash-out process involves removing the tool by spraying pressurized water. The spars were bonded to a wing-skin panel in a secondary cure process. During the initial cures of the spar and skin panel, each of the surfaces that were to be bonded during the secondary process had an outer prepreg layer containing a higher epoxy volume fraction than typical prepreg plies. This epoxy was un-reacted during the initial cure. During the secondary cure, prepreg with additional hardener was added at the joint interface, along with a layer of adhesive. This bonding process resulted in a joint comparable to a co-cured assembly rather than a traditional adhesive bond. The two different MDUs had subtle variations in the secondary bonding process. Coordinate measurement machine (CMM) three-dimensional (3D) scans of the two MDUs revealed that the MDU that used an envelope bag during secondary cure was more warped than the MDU that had been bagged to a flat tool surface. Hardener rich ply orientation may have also played a role in level of warp observed in the MDUs.

References: 1. Vaca EB. FUSION BONDING OF FIBER REINFORCED SEMI-CRYSTALLINE POLYMERS IN EXTRUSION DEPOSITION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. 2018. 2. Rahate AS, Nemade KR, Waghuley SA. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS): state of the art and applications. Rev Chem Eng 3. Weichenhain J, Althaus P, Hübner S, Wester H, Rosenbusch D, Behrens BA. Investigation of a Compression Molding Process for the Variant Flexible Production of a GMT Battery Shell. In: Behrens BA, Brosius A, Drossel WG, Hintze W, Ihlenfeldt S, Nyhuis P 4. Parodi E, Govaert LE, Peters GWM. Glass transition temperature versus structure of polyamide 6: A flash-DSC study. Thermochim Acta. 5. Gordon. SWIFTPLYTM PA6 Carbon Tape [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct 22]. Available from: https://www.gordonplastics.com/_files/ugd/83595b_db81fc54073849c2929b477e565a173b.pd f 6. Chen Z, Shi W, Zhang W, Zhao B, Zhao C, Liu Y. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) fibrous felt coated with conductive polyaniline via in situ polymerization for smart high-temperature bagfilter. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019;369:340-8. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332217910_Polyphenylene_sulfide_PPS_fibrous_fel t_coated_with_conductive_polyaniline_via_in_situ_polymerization_for_smart_high_temperat ure_bag-filter 7. Kadiyala A, Thomasson J. Experimental and numerical evaluation of thermoplastic composite joints under thermal loading. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2014;33(6):56779. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0731684413515955

Conference: SAMPE 2025

Publication Date: 2025/05/19

SKU: TP25-0000000064

Pages: 22

Price: $44.00