Search

DIGITAL LIBRARY: SAMPE 2025 | INDIANAPOLIS, IN | MAY 19-22

Get This Paper

Investigation of Fiber Volume Fraction as Key Parameter in Cryogenic Hydrogen Tank Development

Description

Title: Investigation of Fiber Volume Fraction as Key Parameter in Cryogenic Hydrogen Tank Development

Authors: Jonas Appels, Philipp Sämann, Jonas Naumann, Christoph Brauer, Daniel Stefaniak, Bilim Atli-Veltin, Clemens Dransfeld

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.25.0109

Abstract: In developing Type V hydrogen tanks for energy storage in commercial airliners, the key design criterion is maintaining leak-tightness under cryogenic conditions. A concern is that anomalies in the laminate could cause microcracks, potentially compromising leak-tightness. This study investigates how resin flow, caused by mandrel expansion during curing, creates a gradient in the local fiber volume fraction (FVF) along the laminate thickness. An experimental study was performed comparing two resin systems, Hexcel 6376 and Teijin Q183. Cylindrical specimens were manufactured incorporating piezoresistive sensors to measure contact pressure at the mandrel-laminate interface during the autoclave cycle, serving as an indicator of resin flow and FVF variation. Micrographs of the specimen were taken, and a machine learning-based segmentation model was used to detect fibers and resin in the images, enabling calculation of the local FVF. The results show distinct through-the-thickness gradients in FVF for both laminates with a spread of 11.6 %pt. for Hexcel 6376 and 4.5 %pt. for Teijin Q183. These observations could be correlated to the processing characteristics of the two systems and therefore provide valuable insights for developing strategies to minimize FVF gradients in the design of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) tanks for liquid hydrogen.

References: 1. M. Li, J. Lu, Z. Chen, and K. Amine, 30 Years of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Volume 30, Issue 33. Advanced Materials: Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800561 2018. DOI: 2. L. Asp, K. Bouton, D. Carlstedt, S. Duan, R.Harnden, W. Johannisson, M. Johansen, M. K. G. Johansson, G. Lindbergh, F. Liu, K. Peuvot, L. M. Schneider, J. Xu, and D. Zenkert, A Structural Battery and its Multifunctional Performance. Volume 2, Issue 3. Advanced Energy and Sustainability https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202000093 Research: Wiley, 2021 DOI: 3. J. Snyder, R. Carter, and E. Wetzel, Electrochemical and Mechanical Behavior in Mechanically Robust Solid Polymer Electrolytes for Use in Multifunctional Structural Batteries. Volume 19, Issue 15. Chemistry of Materials: ACS Publications, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cm070213o 4. J. Xu, Z. Geng, M. Johansen, D. Carlstedt, S. Duan, T. Thiringer, F. Liu, and L. Asp, A multicell structural battery composite laminate. Volume 4, Issue 3. EcoMat: Wiley, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.12180 5. K. Moyer, C. Meng, B. Marshall, O. Assal, J. Eaves, D. Perez, R. Karkkainen, L. Roberson, and C. L. Pint, Carbon fiber reinforced structural lithium-ion battery composite: Multifunctional power integration for CubeSats. Volume 24. Energy Storage Materials: Elsevier, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.003 6. W. Huang, P. Wang, X. Liao, Y. Chen, J. Borovilas, T. Jin, A. Li, Q. Cheng, Y. Zhang, H. Zhai, A. Chitu, Z. Shan, and Y. Yang, Mechanically-robust structural lithium-sulfur battery with high energy density. Volume 33. Energy Storage Materials: Elsevier, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.018 7. Y. Miao, P. Hynan, A. von Jouanne, and A. Yokochi, Current Li-Ion Battery Technologies in Electric Vehicles and Opportunities for Advancements. Volume 12, Issue 6. Energies: MDPI, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061074 8. J. Fergus, Ceramic and polymeric solid electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. Volume, 195, Issue 15. Journal of Power Sources: Elsevier, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.076 9. F. Gucci, M. Grasso, C. Shaw, G. Leighton, V. Marchante Rodriguez, and J. Brighton, PEO-based polymer blend electrolyte for composite structural battery. Volume 62, Issue 8. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials: Taylor & Francis, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2023.2180391 10. T.E. Attwood, P.C. Dawson, J.L. Freeman, L.R.J. Hoy, J.B. Rose, and P.A. Staniland, Synthesis and properties of polyaryletherketones. Volume 22, Issue 8. Polymer: Elsevier, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(81)90299-8 11. J.C. Seferis, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK): Processing-structure and properties studies for a matrix in high performance composites. Volume 7, Issue 3. Polymer Composites: Wiley, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750070305 12. T. Yap, N. Heathman, B. Shirani Bibabadi, E. Motta de Castro, A. Tamijani, A. Asadi, and M. Tehrani, In-plane properties of an in-situ consolidated automated fiber placement thermoplastic composite. Volume 188. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108525 13. Y. Qin, G. Ge, J. Yun, X. Tian, X. Liu, J. Han, and S. Gao, Enhanced impregnation behavior and interfacial bonding in CF.PEEK prepreg filaments for 3D printing application. Volume 20. Journal of Materials Research and Technology: Elsevier, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.005 14. B.J. Ree, B. Zheng, A. Abbott, L. M. Smieska, A. R. Woll, Z. Renwick, and H. Koerner, Mapping Crystallization Kinetics during 3D Printing of Poly(ether ether ketone). Volume 57, Issue 6. Macromolecules: ACS Publications, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c02327 15. M. Carrola, H. Fallahi, H. Koerner, L.M. Perez, and A. Asadi, Fundamentals of crystalline evolution and properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced polyether ether ketone nanocomposites in fused filament fabrication. Volume 15, Issue 18. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces: ACS Publications, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c01307 16. B. Shirani Bibabadi, E. Motta de Castro, M. Carrola. P. Koirala, M. Tehrani, and A. Asadi, Engineering the Crystalline Architecture for Enhanced Properties in Fast-Rate Processing of Poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) Nanocomposites. Volume 2, Issue 8. ACS Applied Engineering Materials: ACS Publications, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaenm.4c00217 17. N.R. Enos, O.D. McNair, and J.S. Wiggins, The Influence of Carbon Fiber on Crystallization and Morphology of Poly(Ether Ketone Ketone) Composites Towards High Rate Thermoplastic Manufacturing Processes. Volume 60, Issue 6. SAMPE Journal: SAMPE. DOI: 10.33599/SJ.v60no6.02 18. L. Li, R. Xiong, X. Wang, M. Zhou, S. Sun, G. Shen, L. Song, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhou, Lithiated poly(ether ether ketone) separators with excellent thermal stability and electrolyte wettability for lithium-ion battery. Volume 57. Journal of Materials Science: Springer, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07761-0 19. L. Smieska, R. Mullett, L. Ferri, and A.R. Woll, Trace elements in natural azurite pigments found in illuminated manuscript leaves investigated by synchrotron x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and diffraction mapping. Volume 123. Applied Physics A: Springer, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-1093-0 20. S. Banerjee and K.K. Kar, Impact of degree of sulfonation on microstructure, thermal, thermomechanical and physicochemical properties of sulfonated poly ether ether ketone. Volume 109. Polymer: Elsevier, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.030 21. G. Liu, N. Hu, J. Huang, Q. Tu, and F. Xu, Experimental Investigation on the Mechanical and Dynamic Thermomechanical Properties of Polyether Ether Ketone Based on Fused Deposition Modelling. Volume 16, Issue 21. Polymers: MDPI, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16213007

Conference: SAMPE 2025

Publication Date: 2025/05/19

SKU: TP25-0000000109

Pages: 16

Price: $32.00

Get This Paper