Title: Beyond Physical Testing: Unveiling the Hidden Insights of Polymers and Composites with X-Ray Techniques

Authors: Julia Sedlmair, Nathan Henderson, Tina Hill, William Reese

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.25.0117

Abstract: X-ray techniques, while established in other industries, are underutilized in the polymer and composite sectors despite their potential to provide critical chemical and structural insights. Often, testing in this field has centered around physical properties, but methods like X-ray fluorescence (XRF), micro-XRF (μXRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray tomography (CT) offer a wealth of information on elemental composition and internal structures that can significantly enhance material analysis. This talk provides an overview of how these analytical methods can enhance the evaluation of polymer and composite materials at various stages of production. XRF and μXRF reveal detailed information about the elemental makeup, from bulk feedstocks to fine-scale elemental mapping across surfaces. XRD identifies crystalline structures that impact material performance, while CT enables non-destructive 3D imaging of internal features, such as voids or defects, that could compromise material integrity. We will present case studies demonstrating how these x-ray methods can be integrated into polymer and composite testing. Attendees will gain a clear understanding of why these methods are key to advancing analysis in this evolving industry.

References: [1] J.R. Shao, N. Liu, and Z.J. Zheng, Numerical comparison between Hashin and Chang-Chang failure criteria in terms of inter-laminar damage behavior of laminated composite. Materials Research Express, 8(8): p. 085602, 2021. [2] H. Xie, G. Liu, J. Yao, D. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cao, J Zhang, C Chen, Finite element analysis of the effect of crystallinity on low-velocity impact performance of poly (aryl ether ketone) composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 58(5): p. 585-600, 2024. [3] S. Lin, A.M. Waas, Accelerating computational analyses of low velocity impact and compression after impact of laminated composite materials. Composite Structures, 260: p. 113456, 2021. [4] K. Zhu, X. Zheng, J. Peng, J. Sun, R. Huang, L. Yan, The relationship between the impact position interference and CAI strength of composite sandwich structures under double impacts. Composites Part B: Engineering, 268: p. 111092, 2024. [5] Z. Hashin, Z., A. Rotem, A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. Journal of composite materials, 7(4): p. 448-464, 1973. [6] Z. Hashin, Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. 1980. [7] Y. Nagumo, M. Hamanaka, K. Shirasu, K. Ryuzono, A. Yoshimura, H. Tohmyoh, T. Okabe, Fracture mechanism of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite laminates under compression after impact. Journal of Composite Materials, 58(11): p. 1377-1390, 2024. [8] Toray Advanced Composites. 2020. Toray Cetex(R) TC1225. April 22. Accessed April 16, 2022.https://www.toraytac.com/media/3bd72fac-0406-48e4-bfc42ffd2398ac0c/zipxIA/TAC/Documents/Data_sheets/Thermoplastic/UD%20tapes,%20prepregs% 20and%20laminates/Toray-Cetex-TC1225_PAEK_PDS.pdf. [9] M.M. Shahzamanian, D.J. Lloyd, P.D. Wu, Z. Xu, Study of influence of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on bendability of sheet metals. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 85: p. 104132, 2021. [10] M.M. Shahzamanian Sichani, A Unified Fracture Model for X65 Pipeline Material Under Various Constraints Using the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM). Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, p. 1-30, 2024.

Conference: SAMPE 2025

Publication Date: 2025/05/19

SKU: TP25-0000000117

Pages: 10

Price: $20.00