Title: Out-of-Autoclave Molding of Thick Carbon Fiber Reinforced Tubes by using Shrinkable Tubes

Authors: Fabrizio Quadrini, Alice Proietti, Leandro Iorio, Giorgio Patrizii, Dounia Noqra, Denise Bellisario, Loredana Santo

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.25.0121

Abstract: Carbon fiber reinforced (CFR) tubes for aeronautic and aerospace are manufactured by wrapping and autoclave curing. These technologies present technological and cost barriers for the automotive and urban air mobility (UAM) sectors. Autoclave molding is an expensive process because of the time, energy and materials involved. In this study, an out-of-autoclave (OOA) process is proposed by using shape memory polymers (SMPs). Composite tubes have been prototyped by winding CFR prepregs on a rigid mandrel, and agglomeration has been achieved in oven by the pressure of a thermo-shrinkable tube. Final composites have 11, 19 and 26 CFR plies, with thickness from 3.2 mm to 7.2 mm and internal diameter of 28 mm. Ring samples with a width of 15 mm have been cut from the molded samples to observe its section and to perform transverse compressive tests. Defects have been found as wrinkles and porosity, but a good agglomeration has been already reached, and improvements are possible by using vacuum bagging and internal SMP cores. The proposed technology has the potential to manufacture thick CFR tubes by tailoring the consolidation pressure with higher production rate and lower cost than autoclave, as necessary to sustain the future automotive and UAM market.

References: 1. Ben-Bassat, Avner. “Real-Time Tracking of Parts & Material Genealogy Improves Throughput and Quality.” JEC Composites Magazine, vol. 107, 2016, pp. 34-35. Plataine, 25 Jan. 2019, https://www.plataine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/JECMagazie107_Manufacturing_Platain-PRINT.pdf. 2. “Digitizing Composites Production: Addressing Supply Chain and Workforce Challenges.” CompositesWorld, https://www.compositesworld.com/events/details/digitizing-compositesproduction-addressing-supply-chain-and-workforce-challenges. 3. Cemenska, J., Rudberg, T., Henscheid, M., Lauletta, A., et al. “AFP Automated Inspection System Performance and Expectations.” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2150, 2017, DOI:10.4271/2017-01-2150. 4. Saulsberry, R. “Development of a Composite Pressure Vessel Laser Profilometry and Eddy Current Scanning System to Meet Manufacturing and Analytical Needs.” NASA Engineering & Safety Center, news release, 30 Nov. 2016. 5. Black, S. “Improving Composites Processing with Automated Inspection, Part II.” CompositesWorld, vol. 4, no. 6, June 2018. 6. Arinez, J.F., Q. Chang, R.X. Gao, C. Xu, and J. Zhang. “Artificial Intelligence in Advanced Manufacturing: Current Status and Future Outlook.” ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 142, no. 11, Nov. 2020, 110804. DOI: 10.1115/1.4047855. 7. Blake, S. “Generating Good Data for AI-Based Automatic Inspection and Remediation of Large-Scale Composite Components.” SAMPE Technical Paper TP23-149, 2023. 8. Leiva, C. “Demystifying the Digital Thread and Digital Twin Concepts.” Industry Week, 25 Aug. 2018, https://www.industryweek.com/systems-integration/demystifying-digital-threadand-digital-twin-concepts. 9. Hahn, T. “Artificial Intelligence: Optimizing Industrial Operations.” The European Files, vol. 54, 2018, p. 30. 10. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) vs. Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning.” Skymind, 25 Jan. 2019, https://skymind.ai/wiki/ai-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning. 11. Garcia-Garcia, A., Orts-Escolano, S., Oprea, S., Villena-Martinez, V., Martinez-Gonzalez, P., and Garcia-Rodriguez, J. “A Survey on Deep Learning Techniques for Image and Video Semantic Segmentation.” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 70, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.018. 12. Scime, L., Siddel, D., Baird, S., and Paquit, V. “Layer-Wise Anomaly Detection and Classification for Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Processes: A Machine-Agnostic Algorithm for Real-Time Pixel-Wise Semantic Segmentation.” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 36, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101453. 13. Paquit, Vincent. Interview by Scott Blake and Karen Mason, 18 Aug. 2020. 14. Blake, S. “A Systems Solution to Quality Escapes in Composites Manufacturing.” CAMX Technical Paper TP24-295. 15. Blake, S. and Atai, A. “Accelerating In-Process Automatic Inspection Engineering: Removing Inhibitors to Rapid Machine Learning-Based Application Development.” SAMPE Technical Paper TP21-472, 2021. 16. Rudberg, T., Nielson, J., Henscheid, M., and Cemenska, J. “Improving AFP Cell Performance.” SAE International Journal of Aerospace, vol. 7, no. 2, 2014, DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-2272. 17. Halbritter, A., and Harper, R. “Big Parts Demand Big Changes to the Fiber Placement Status Quo.” Presented at SME Composites Manufacturing, Mesa, AZ, Mar. 2012. 18. Blake, S. “The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning to Enable Widespread Application of Automatic Inspection to Composites Fabrication.” CAMX Technical Paper TP-21-451, 2021. 19. Marcinkoski, J., B. James, and R. Ahluwalia. “Hydrogen Class 8 Long Haul Truck Targets.” DOE Advanced Truck Technologies Subsection of the Electrified Powertrain Roadmap Technical Targets for Hydrogen-Fueled Long-Haul Tractor-Trailer Trucks, 31 Oct. 2019, https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/19006_hydrogen_class8_long_haul_truck_targets.pdf

Conference: SAMPE 2025

Publication Date: 2025/05/19

SKU: TP25-0000000121

Pages: 16

Price: $32.00