Title: Effect of Blank Consolidation Level on Properties of Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Stamp-Formed Parts

Authors: Terry Hines, DeWayne Howell, Wyatt Taylor, Zachary Peck, Salvador Calderon, Kouki Yoshino, Atsuki Tsuchiya, Koji Suzuki, Toa Iyota

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.25.0208

Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of consolidation level in thermoplastic composite blanks on the final properties of stamp-formed parts. Stamp forming of thermoplastic composites has gained popularity in manufacturing due to its rapid processing capabilities, aligning with industry demands for reduced cycle times. However, current practices typically involve fully consolidating laminates prior to stamping, potentially extending overall production time. Through a series of experiments varying consolidation parameters, this study analyzes how different levels of pre-consolidation affect forming behavior, void content, and ultimately, the mechanical performance of the final part. The results of this investigation may provide insights into optimizing the balance between processing efficiency and part quality, potentially enabling manufacturers to streamline production while maintaining desired material properties.

References: [1] Ren S, Rong P, Yu Q. Preparations, properties and applications of graphene in functional devices: A concise review. Ceramics International 2018. [2] Johnson DW, Dobson BP, Coleman KS. A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 2015;20:367–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2015.11.004. [3] Sherman LM. A Bright Future for Thermally Conductive Plastics n.d. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/abright-future-for-thermally-conductive-plastics (accessed November 8, 2021). [4] Liu J, Li Y, Xiang D, Zhao C, Wang B, Li H. Enhanced Electrical Conductivity and Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of CF/EP Composites via Interleaving Conductive Thermoplastic Films. Appl Compos Mater 2021;28:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-020-09848-w. [5] Plastech. Graphene nanotubes in plastics are the basis for cars of the future n.d. https://www.plastech.biz/en/news/Graphene-nanotubes-in-plastics-are-the-basis-for-cars-of-the-15628 (accessed November 8, 2021). [6] Clark R. Real world graphene: Industrial applications for the 21st century 2017. [7] Geim AK, Novoselov KS. THE RISE OF GRAPHENE n.d.:14. [8] Inagaki M, Kang F, Toyoda M, Konno H. Advanced Materials Science and Engineering of Carbon. Elsevier; 2014. [9] Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, et al. Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Advanced Materials 2010;22:3906–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201001068. [10] Specialty graphene additives functionalize composite systems 2024. https://www.compositesworld.com/products/specialty-graphene-additives-functionalize-composite-systems (accessed December 5, 2024). [11] Joshi SC, Dikshit V. Enhancing interlaminar fracture characteristics of woven CFRP prepreg composites through CNT dispersion. Journal of Composite Materials 2012;46:665–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311410472. [12] Gong, G., 2018. Literature study of graphene modified polymeric composites. Siografen, 2(4), pp.13-14. [13] Lv R, Ren Y, Guo H, Bai S. Recent progress on thermal conductivity of graphene filled epoxy composites. Nano Materials Science 2022;4:205–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.06.001. [14] Su Y, Li JJ, Weng GJ. Theory of thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer nanocomposites with interfacial Kapitza resistance and graphene-graphene contact resistance. Carbon 2018;137:222–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.033. [15] Md Said NH, Liu W, Khe C, Lai C, Zulkepli NN, Aziz A. Review of the past and recent developments in functionalization of graphene derivatives for reinforcement of polypropylene nanocomposites. Polymer Composites 2021;42:1075–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25922. [16] Pizza A, Metz R, Hassanzadeh M, Bantignies J-L. Life cycle assessment of nanocomposites made of thermally conductive graphite nanoplatelets. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2014;19:1226–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367014-0733-2. [17] Cossutta M, McKechnie J, Pickering SJ. Comparative LCA of different graphene production routes. University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK 2017:18. [18] Serrano-Luján L, Víctor-Román S, Toledo C, Sanahuja-Parejo O, Mansour AE, Abad J, et al. Environmental impact of the production of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. SN Appl Sci 2019;1:179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0193-1. [19] Arvidsson R. Review of environmental life cycle assessment studies of graphene production. Adv Mater Lett 2017;8:187–95. https://doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2017.1413. [20] Wissler M. Graphite and carbon powders for electrochemical applications. Journal of Power Sources 2006;156:142–50. [21] Muradov NZ, Veziroğlu TN. “Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: an overview of carbonneutral technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:6804–39. [22] Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, et al. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 2014;99:19–33. [23] Ma L-L, Liu W-J, Hu X, Lam PKS, Zeng JR, Yu H-Q. Ionothermal carbonization of biomass to construct sp2/sp3 carbon interface in N-doped biochar as efficient oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020;400:125969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125969. [24] Müller, J.O., Su, D.S. and Schlögl, R., 2006. Carbon Hybridization Determination in Soot and Carbon Black. In 12th WIEN2k workshop+ International Conference on Density Functional Theory (DFT) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). [25] Mulqueen DW, Sattar S, Kravchenko OG, Le T. Spray deposition of sustainable plant based graphene in thermosetting carbon fiber laminates for mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. Polym Compos 2022;43:8696–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.27051. [26] Mulqueen DW, Sattar S, Kravchenko OG. Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon fiber epoxy composite with interlaminar graphene at elevated temperature. Composites Part B: Engineering 2023;255:110609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110609. [27] Bilisik K, Akter M. Graphene nanocomposites: A review on processes, properties, and applications. Journal of Industrial Textiles 2022;51:3718S-3766S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837211024252. [28] Batista CAS, Larson RG, Kotov NA. Nonadditivity of nanoparticle interactions. Science 2015;350:1242477. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242477. [29] Medic D, Darr M, Shah A, Rahn S. The Effects of Particle Size, Different Corn Stover Components, and Gas Residence Time on Torrefaction of Corn Stover. Energies 2012;5:1199–214. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5041199. [30] Polin JP, Carr HD, Whitmer LE, Smith RG, Brown RC. Conventional and autothermal pyrolysis of corn stover: Overcoming the processing challenges of high-ash agricultural residues. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2019;143:104679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104679. [31] Munawar MA, Khoja AH, Naqvi SR, Mehran MT, Hassan M, Liaquat R, et al. Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021;150:111451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111451. [32] Mulqueen DW. Chemical and Physical Interaction Mechanisms and Multifunctional Properties of Plant Based Graphene in Carbon Fiber Epoxy Composites. Old Dominion University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2023. [33] Golling FE, Pires R, Hecking A, Weikard J, Richter F, Danielmeier K, et al. Polyurethanes for coatings and adhesives – chemistry and applications. Polymer International 2019;68:848–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5665. [34] Monaghan S, Pethrick RA. Solvent Effects in Polyurethane Cure: A Model Study. Macromolecules 2012;45:3928–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma300514e. [35] Martí M, Molina L, Alemán C, Armelin E. Novel Epoxy Coating Based on DMSO as a Green Solvent, Reducing Drastically the Volatile Organic Compound Content and Using Conducting Polymers As a Nontoxic Anticorrosive Pigment. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2013;1:1609–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400271k. [36] Testing Adhesives for Resistance to DMSO | MasterBond.com n.d. https://www.masterbond.com/articles/testing-adhesives-resistance-dmso (accessed April 17, 2023). [37] US EPA O. Risk Evaluation for n-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP) 2017. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-andmanaging-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-n-methylpyrrolidone-nmp-0 (accessed April 17, 2023). [38] Holloway CL, Hill DA, Ladbury J, Koepke G, Garzia R. Shielding effectiveness measurements of materials using nested reverberation chambers. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 2003;45:350–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2003.809117. [39] Marvin AC, Dawson L, Flintoft ID, Dawson JF. A Method for the Measurement of Shielding Effectiveness of Planar Samples Requiring No Sample Edge Preparation or Contact. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 2009;51:255–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2009.2015147. [40] Electrical ACD-9 on, Materials EI. Standard test method for measuring the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of planar materials, American Society for Testing and Materials; 1999. [41] Childres I, Jauregui LA, Park W, Cao H, Chen YP. RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY OF GRAPHENE AND RELATED MATERIALS n.d.:20. [42] Wall M. Raman Imaging: A Critical Tool for Realizing Graphene and Graphene Composite Materials Thermo Fisher Scientific 2014. [43] Mulqueen DW. "Producing Multifunctional Pa6/Organosheet Composites with Sustainable Plant Based Graphene Coatings," SAMPE 2024 Long Beach, California, USA: 2024. [44] Groop, E.E., Nowicki, A.W., Calle, C.I., Buhler, C.R. and Mantovani, J.G., Comparison of surface resistivity and triboelectric charge generation characteristics of materials. Proceedings of the 40th Space Congress (Vol. 6, pp. 1-6) 2003, April.

Conference: SAMPE 2025

Publication Date: 2025/05/19

SKU: TP25-0000000208

Pages: 15

Price: $30.00