DIGITAL LIBRARY: SAMPE 2026 | SEATTLE, WA | APRIL 27-30

Get This Paper

A User-Friendly GUI Tool for Automated Microstructural Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composites and Porous Structures

Description

Title: A User-Friendly GUI Tool for Automated Microstructural Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composites and Porous Structures

Authors: Komal Chawla, Ahmed Hassen, Vipin Kumar, Segun Talabi, Seokpum Kim, Vlastimil Kunc

DOI:

Abstract: Understanding and quantifying microstructural features such as fiber orientation and porosity is critical for predicting the mechanical behavior and performance of fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Traditional manual analysis is time-consuming, subjective, and unsuitable for highthroughput datasets. We present a graphical user interface (GUI) application that automates the analysis of microscopy images to extract key microstructural metrics, including fiber orientation tensors, fiber orientation distribution, porosity and pore size distribution. The app integrates multiple image segmentation techniques including global and local thresholding, clustering, and region-based approaches, offering flexibility for different types of image qualities and features. Users can load microstructural images, select regions of interest and segmentation techniques tailored to their image dataset. It also addresses a critical challenge in fiber orientation analysis: the ambiguities caused by touching, overlapping, or partially cut fibers. It supports autorun examples for standardized workflows, enabling reproducible analysis and facilitating training and benchmarking. This tool significantly reduces manual intervention, enhances consistency, and accelerates data generation for structure–property modeling, process optimization, and digital materials research. The tool is intended for use by materials scientists, engineers, and researchers engaged in composite characterization, quality control, and machine learning-based microstructural studies.

References: 1. on: Yutai, S., et al., Statistical effects of pore features on mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of heterogeneous random porous materials by phase-field modeling. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2022. 264: p. 112098. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Hao, X., et al., Effects of fiber geometry and orientation distribution on the anisotropy of mechanical properties, creep behavior, and thermal expansion of natural fiber/HDPE composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020. 185: p. 107778. Jhunjhunwala, P. and A. Gupta, Effect of porosity on the quality of 3D printed structures. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023. 127(1): p. 899909. Talabi, S.I., et al., Fiber orientation and porosity in large-format extrusion process: The role of processing parameters. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2025. 194: p. 108891. Mattingly, F., et al., Vacuum-assisted extrusion to reduce internal porosity in largeformat additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 2025. 97: p. 104612. du Plessis, A., et al., X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography in Additive Manufacturing: A Review of the Current Technology and Applications. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2018. 5(3): p. 227-247. Hojat, N., et al., Automatic pore size measurements from scanning electron microscopy images of porous scaffolds. Journal of Porous Materials, 2023. 30(1): p. 93-101. 8. Safari, H., B.J. Balcom, and A. Afrough, Characterization of pore and grain size distributions in porous geological samples – An image processing workflow. Computers & Geosciences, 2021. 156: p. 104895. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Rashidi, A., et al., A Review of Current Challenges and Case Study toward Optimizing Micro-Computed X-Ray Tomography of Carbon Fabric Composites. Materials, 2020. 13: p. 3606. Schlüter, S., et al., Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review. Water Resources Research, 2014. 50(4): p. 3615-3639. Cole, M.E., et al., Pore Extractor 2D: An ImageJ toolkit for quantifying cortical pore morphometry on histological bone images, with application to intraskeletal and regional patterning. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 2022. 179(3): p. 365-385. Naresh, K., et al., The use of X-ray computed tomography for design and process modeling of aerospace composites: A review. Materials & Design, 2020. 190: p. 108553. Auenhammer, R.M., et al., Fibre orientation distribution function mapping for short fibre polymer composite components from low resolution/large volume X-ray computed tomography. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024. 275: p. 111313. Wang, S., et al., Image Based Measurement of Individual Fiber Lengths for Randomly Oriented Short Fiber Composites. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2022. 41(2): p. 45. Wilbig, J., et al. Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 2025. 15, 9876 DOI: 10.3390/app15189876. Abera, K.A., K.N. Manahiloh, and M. Motalleb Nejad, The effectiveness of global thresholding techniques in segmenting two-phase porous media. Construction and Building Materials, 2017. 142: p. 256-267. Bradley, D. and G. Roth, Adaptive Thresholding using the Integral Image. J. Graphics Tools, 2007. 12: p. 13-21. Chaki, N., S. Shaikh, and K. Saeed, Exploring Image Binarization Techniques. Vol. 560. 2014. Goh, T.Y., et al., Performance analysis of image thresholding: Otsu technique. Measurement, 2018. 114: p. 298-307. Kittler, J. and J. Illingworth, On threshold selection using clustering criteria. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1985. SMC-15(5): p. 652-655. Liao, J., et al., Automatic Segmentation of Crop/Background Based on Luminance Partition Correction and Adaptive Threshold. IEEE Access, 2020. 8: p. 202611-202622. Lifton, J. and T. Liu, An adaptive thresholding algorithm for porosity measurement of additively manufactured metal test samples via X-ray computed tomography. Additive Manufacturing, 2021. 39: p. 101899. Malcolm, A.A., et al., Image segmentation and analysis for porosity measurement. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007. 192-193: p. 391-396. 24. Otsu, N., A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979. 9(1): p. 62-66. 25. Rezaei, F., et al., The effectiveness of different thresholding techniques in segmenting micro CT images of porous carbonates to estimate porosity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019. 177: p. 518-527. 26. Chawla, K., et al., Benchmarking Image Processing Techniques for Automatic Porosity Measurement in Polymer Additive Manufacturing: Review and Experimental Analysis. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2025. Under Review.

Conference: SAMPE 2026

Publication Date: 2026/04/27

SKU: 64

Pages: 12

Price: $24.00

Get This Paper