Title: Fatigue Performance Under Rotational Bending and Axial Performance of 1018 Steel: Effect of Surface Roughness and Failure
Authors: Brennan Hume, Akawut Siriruk, Dayakar Penumadu
DOI:
Abstract: 1018 Steel is a vital alloy used in the automotive, aerospace, and defense industries due to its exceptional mechanical properties. Understanding fatigue properties is crucial for developing process-structure-property relationships and evaluating failure mechanisms. Rotational bending fatigue is preferred over axial fatigue testing for its excellent efficiency in high-cycle loading applications. This study aims to evaluate rotational bending fatigue behavior for 1018 steel to expedite high-cycle fatigue data collection. Hourglass-shaped specimens, prepared according to the rotating bar fatigue testing standard ISO 1143, are subjected to rotational bending fatigue tests. The stress fatigue life cycle data are then compared to benchmark axial fatigue data for 1018 steel. This study analysis reveals that axial fatigue strength is consistently lower than rotational bending strength for a given fatigue life. This discrepancy stems from differing stress distributions: axial tests subject the entire cross-section to maximum stress, while rotational bending concentrates maximum stress at the surface. The established quantitative relationship allows for faster, more efficient rotational bending tests to accurately supplement and improve data collection from axial fatigue performance, significantly accelerating material characterization.
References: [1] E. ASTM, Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials, West Conshohocken (2007) [2] A. Esin, A method for correlating different types of fatigue curve, International Journal of Fatigue 2(4) (1980) 153–158.https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(80)90042-0 [3] A. International, Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials, ASTM E466-21, 2021. [4] Y. Li, D. Retraint, H. Xue, T. Gao, Z. Sun, Fatigue properties and cracking mechanisms of a 7075 aluminum alloy under axial and torsional loadings, Procedia Structural Integrity 19 (2019) 637–644.10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.069 [5] S.S. Manson, U. Muralidharan, FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION IN BENDING FROM AXIAL FATIGUE INFORMATION, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 9(5) (1987) 357–372.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00462.x [6] M. Nakajima, K. Tokaji, H. Itoga, T. Shimizu, Effect of loading condition on very high cycle fatigue behavior in a high strength steel, International Journal of Fatigue 32(2) (2010) 475480.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.003 [7] R. Shrestha, J. Simsiriwong, N. Shamsaei, Comparison of Rotating-Bending and Axial Fatigue Behaviors of LB-PBF 316L Stainless Steel, 2019. [8] R. Shrestha, J. Simsiriwong, N. Shamsaei, Fatigue behavior of additive manufactured 316L stainless steel under axial versus rotating-bending loading: Synergistic effects of stress gradient, surface roughness, and volumetric defects, International Journal of Fatigue 144 (2021) 106063.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106063 [9] I.O.f. Standardization, Metallic Materials-Rotating Bar Bending Fatigue Testing, ISO2010. [10] R.I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R.R. Stephens, H.O. Fuchs, Metal fatigue in engineering, John Wiley & Sons2000. [11] C. Urashima, S.-I. Nishida, R. Ebara, Y. Yamada, K. Yamamura, Comparison Between Rotating Bending and Push-Pull Fatigue Strength in Low Cycle Region, in: K.T. Rie (Ed.), Low Cycle Fatigue and Elasto-Plastic Behaviour of Materials, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1987, pp. 538–543. [12] H. Wentzel, X. Huang, Experimental characterization of the bending fatigue strength of threaded fasteners, International Journal of Fatigue 72 (2015) 102108.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.11.005 [13] A. Zhao, J. Xie, C. Sun, Z. Lei, Y. Hong, Effects of strength level and loading frequency on very-high-cycle fatigue behavior for a bearing steel, International Journal of Fatigue 38 (2012) 46–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.014
Conference: SAMPE 2026
Publication Date: 2026/04/27
SKU: 86
Pages: 13
Price: $26.00
Get This Paper