Get This Paper

Reliable Optimized Structures with High Performance Continuous Fiber Thermoplastic Composites From Additive Manufacturing (AM)


Title: Reliable Optimized Structures with High Performance Continuous Fiber Thermoplastic Composites From Additive Manufacturing (AM)

Authors: Danning Zhang, Natalie Rudolph, Peter Woytowitz

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1396

Abstract: Additive Manufacturing (AM) is still one of the fastest growing manufacturing areas. While metal AM parts are more and more used for structural applications, few plastic AM parts and processes provide sufficient durability for this purpose. One of the problems is related to the lack of reliable material data for design as well as missing component level tests. Therefore, simulation efforts are progressing at slow speeds and often cannot be validated with experimental data. AREVO has overcome this challenge with its Direct Energy Deposition (DED) process that is capable to process carbon fiber volume contents of 50% and more as well as its modeling and software capabilities. In this paper, the mechanical properties including tension, compression, flexural, interlaminar shear, open hole tension and compression, fracture toughness, impact resistance and compression strength after impact (CAI) of the AREVO materials are reported. It can be seen that the mechanical properties are comparable with traditionally manufactured continuous carbon fiber thermoplastic composites. Using this data, the performance of structural components is simulated through an integrated approach considering the processing condition and tool path. The example of a simple structural element is presented here. Good agreement was achieved from the simulation and experimental testing, highlighting the reliability of the AREVO process and software capabilities.

References: 1. N.N., Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Test Series,, accessed on Jan 29, 2019. 2. S.-H. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy, and P. K. Wright, “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS,” Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 248–257, 2002. 3. Bellini, S. Güçeri, “Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling,” Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 252–264, 2003. 4. D. P. B. S. J. Riddick, J.C. Hall, A.J. Haile, M.A. Wahlde, R.V. Cole, “Effect of Manufacturing Parameters on Failure in Acrylonitrile–Butadiane–Styrene Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling,” Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf., vol. 53, no. April, pp. 1–8, 2012. 5. Durgun and R. Ertan, “Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost,” Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 228–235, 2014. 6. B. M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger, and J. M. Pearce, “Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions,” Mater. Des., vol. 58, pp. 242–246, 2014. 7. J. C. Riddick, M. A. Haile, R. Von Wahlde, D. P. Cole, O. Bamiduro, and T. E. Johnson, “Fractographic analysis of tensile failure of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene fabricated by fused deposition modeling,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 11, pp. 49–59, 2016. 8. C. Koch., L. Van Hulle, N. Rudolph, “Investigation of mechanical anisotropy of the fused filament fabrication process via customized tool path generation”, Additive Manufacturing, 16, 2017, pp. 138-145. 9. Y. Zhang, Y.C. Yeoh, G. Zheng, S.K. Moon, “Characterization of mechanical properties of ULTEM 9085 using FDM”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, Singapore, 2018. 10. S.K. Selvamani, M. Samykano, S.R. Subramaniam, G. Kanagaraj, W.K. Ngui, Kadirgama, K., Idris, M.S., “3D printing: overview of ABS evolvement”, AIP Conference Proceedings 2059, 2019. 11. A.R. Zekavat, A. Jansson, J. Larsson, L. Pejryd, “Investigating the effect of fabrication temperature on mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts using X-ray computed tomography” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 100, 2019, pp. 287-296. 12. B. Brenken, E. Barocio, A. Favaloro, V. Kunc, R.B. Pipes, Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review, Additive Manufacturing, Volume 21, 2018, pp. 1-16 13. ASTM International, Designation: D2344/2344M-16, “Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials,” vol. i, pp. 1–8, 2018. 14. J. Comer et al., “Mechanical characterisation of carbon fibre-PEEK manufactured by laser-assisted automated-tape-placement and autoclave,” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 69, pp. 10–20, 2015. 15. D. Zhang, D. Heider, and J. Gillespie, John W., “Void reduction of high-performance thermoplastic composites via oven vacuum bag processing,” J. Compos. Mater., 2017. 16. I. Fernandez, F. Blas, and A. Frovel, “Autoclave forming of thermoplastic composite parts,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 143, pp. 266–269, Dec. 2003. 17. Technical Data Sheet “FDM Nylon 12CF” from Stratasys 18. Toray Carbon Fibers America, “M55J DATA SHEET MJ type high modulus fiber with enhanced tensile and compressive strength over CARBON,” pp. 6–7. 19. F. N. Cogswell, Thermoplastic aromatic polymer composites : a study of the structure, processing, and properties of carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone and related materials. Oxford [England]; Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992. 20. C. M. Stokes-Griffin and P. Compston, “The effect of processing temperature and placement rate on the short beam strength of carbon fibre-PEEK manufactured using a laser tape placement process,” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 78, pp. 274–283, 2015. 21. C. E. Materials, “Technical Data Sheet - CYCOM 5276 Epoxy Resin System,” AECM - 00009, pp. 1–7. 22. Symposium on Toughened Composites (1985 : Houston, Toughened composites : Symposium on Toughened Composites. Philadelphia, PA : American Society for Testing and Materials, 1987. 23. H. Saidpour and M. Barikani, “Mode-II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon/Epoxy Laminates,” Iran. Polym. J., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 389–400, 2003. 24. S. Gao and J. Kim, “Cooling rate influences in carbon fibre / PEEK composites . Part III : impact damage performance,” Compos. Manuf., vol. 32, pp. 775–785, 2001. 25. “A comprehensive review of the materials properties of VICTREX ® PEEK TM high performance polymer,” . 26. R. F. Gibson, “Principals of Composite Material Mechanics”, CRC Press, 4th Ed., 2016 27. R. Jen, C.H. Lee, Strength and life in thermoplastic composite laminates under static and fatigue loads. Part II”, , In. J. Fatigue, Vol 20, No. 9 pp 617-629, 1998 28. N. Rudolph, D. Zhang, P. Woytowitz, “Making the first 3D printed carbon fibre bike”, JEC Composites Magazine, No. 125, Nov-Dec 2018.

Conference: SAMPE 2019 - Charlotte, NC

Publication Date: 2019/05/20

SKU: TP19--1396

Pages: 20

Price: FREE

Get This Paper